|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, February 23, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
ICHR white paper soon
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, FEB. 22. The Chairman of the Indian Council for
Historical Research (ICHR), Prof. B.R. Grover, announced today
that a white paper on the ``Towards Freedom'' project would be
published shortly in view of the controversies it had spawned
since its inception in the early Seventies.
The white paper would include all relevant documents relating to
the objectives of the project, its ``changing guidelines,
shifting deadlines and mounting expenditure'', he said, pointing
out that there had been inordinate delays in completing it. At
one point, ``in disgust'' the Government had decided to wind up
the project, but it was ``salvaged'' following his intervention
as then director and acting chairman of ICHR, Prof. Grover said.
He defended the ICHR decision to withdraw the volumes by Prof.
Sumit Sarkar and Prof. K.N. Panikkar, saying that it had been
decided to review all manuscripts in view of the ``adverse''
reaction to earlier volumes. During the Council meetings on
August 31 and September 1, 1998, it was decided to constitute a
committee to ``streamline'' publication of the remaining volumes
before they were printed. However, a three-member committee which
was set up was ``never convened by the then chairman, Prof. S.
Settar''.
Another committee had now been set up for this purpose. It
comprised Prof. Satish Mittal, former head of the History
Department, Kurukshetra University, Prof. Hari Om, head of the
History Department, Jammu University, and Prof. A.R. Khan, former
head of the History Department, Himachal University.
Prof. Grover said the committee should not be confused with the
one set up by the Human Resource Development Ministry for a
``periodic review'' of the functioning and work of ICHR.
He contended that the ICHR, which was the copyright holder and
which was ``controlling the finances of the project'', had
``every right - legal and moral - to satisfy itself that the
volumes published under its seal of authority'' were upto the
mark, and conformed to the original guidelines. One of these was
that the documents should be arranged in a chronological order,
and not thematically as had been done after the guidelines were
changed by Prof. Irfan Habib when he was ICHR chairman.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Gujarat not to withdraw circular Next : Musharraf speaks of 'war hysteria' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|