|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, February 23, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Spotlight on racism in S.African media
By M. S. Prabhakara
CAPE TOWN, FEB. 22. The issue of racism in the South African
media is once again in the limelight. The Human Rights Commission
(HRC) had subpoenaed several editors of newspapers and the
electronic media, as well as individual columnists, to appear
before it next month to answer questions concerning the issue of
racism in the media, specifically with reference to the policies
and guidelines followed by the recipients ``on the reporting of,
and commenting on, national and international events which impact
on racism and possible incidents of racism''. (The Daily Mail and
Guardian website on Tuesday reported that the HRC had agreed to a
conditional withdrawal of media subpoenas).
The subpoena also required the recipients to produce, on their
appearance, the following ``books and documents'': ``(a)
Policies, guidelines, minutes, and resolutions of meetings,
directives from owners of your media product - which relate to
the handling of matters concerning racism and possible incidents
of racism. (b) Any other documents in your possession or custody
or under your control that are necessary in connection with the
said investigation''. The passage cited, which seems to be a
standard pro forma passage, is from the subpoena received by the
editor of Business Day, a financial daily published from
Johannesburg. The grounds cited also seem typical. The subpoena
in this case referred to three specific reports and comments that
had appeared in the paper on three different days in July last
year, cited in a report prepared by the Media Monitoring Project
released in November last year. The subpoena, citing the
researcher who prepared the HRC commissioned report, said the
passages from the newspaper's reports stereotyped,
depersonalised, or criminalised blacks as a people.
This is the latest act in a drama that has been going on for a
while. The HRC began its investigation into the issue of racism
in South African media about two years ago, following a complaint
by two professional organisations, the Association of Black
Accounts and the Black Lawyers' Association, accusing two leading
Johannesburg-published weekly newspapers, Sunday Times and Daily
Mail and Guardian of (among other things) ``subliminal racism''.
The HRC decided, after holding hearings into these complaints,
that the issue of racism was not limited to these two newspapers
alone, but affected the media as a whole, and decided to hold a
broader inquiry. The HRC initiated this broader inquiry into
``the handling of race and possible incidence of racism in the
products of the media'' on its own, as it is constitutionally
mandated and empowered to do. The sweep of its mandate, as much
as the actual conduct of the inquiry, appear to have angered the
still predominantly white-controlled print media.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Haider touches a raw nerve Next : Mistaken patent for clones | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|