|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, February 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Opposition determined on 'censuring' Govt.
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, FEB. 28. The Lok Sabha was disrupted again today with
the Opposition insisting on ``censuring'' the Vajpayee Government
over the RSS issue, even as the Union Law Minister, Mr. Ram
Jethmalani, defended in the Rajya Sabha the Gujarat Government's
decision to allow its staff to join the RSS.
After two days of disruption and furore over the wording of a
motion to discuss the issue, the Rajya Sabha settled for a short
discussion on the Centre's failure to persuade the Gujarat
Government to withdraw the circular regarding Government
employees joining the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.
Though the Opposition in the Upper House agreed to drop the words
in the motion that the RSS' basic philosophy ran counter to the
letter and spirit of the Constitution, the discussion witnessed
heated exchanges with the BJP staunchly defending the Gujarat
circular and the Opposition attacking it as an act of a much
larger design.
Mr. Jethmalani who defended the Gujarat decision while
participating in his capacity as a member of the House had to end
his speech amidst protests from Opposition benches to his remarks
on the origins of RSS as a response to the failure of the
Khilafat movement of Mahatma Gandhi.
In the Lok Sabha, the bone of contention was the rule under which
a discussion on the issue should be held. The Government's
decision to discuss it under Rule 193, which does not involve
voting, provoked angry protests with the Opposition arguing that
it was too serious an issue to be simply ``talked out''.
Senior Opposition leaders contended that they wanted to
``censure'' the Vajpayee Government for its ``failure'' to
intervene in Gujarat and since a discussion under Rule 193 did
not convey fully the significance of the issue they preferred a
debate under Rule 184 which entailed voting.
The CPI's Mrs. Geeta Mukherjee, in whose name the discussion was
listed, said her party had indeed given notice under Rule 193 but
this was before the Opposition unitedly decided to press for a
vote. The CPI supported the demand for discussion under Rule 184
and was withdrawing her earlier notice, she said.
A point repeatedly made by the Opposition was that since the
Speaker had already disallowed an adjournment motion he should at
least agree to discuss it under Rule 184. ``You have taken the
softest possible opinion'', complained the Congress(I) leader,
Mr. Kamal Nath, pointing out it concerned the entire House.
The Congress(I)'s Deputy Leader in the Lok Sabha, Mr. Madhavrao
Scindia, said the decision to have a discussion under Rule 193
was taken without ``consulting us'' and urged the Speaker to
reconsider it. It was a ``matter of regret'' that a decision was
taken without taking the Opposition into confidence. The
Samajwadi Party leader, Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav, supported the
Congress(I) stand, saying nothing short of a discussion under
Rule 184 would be acceptable to his party.
The trouble began as soon as the House met in the morning with
the CPI(M) demanding a debate on its adjournment motion after
suspending question hour. The party leader, Mr. Somnath
Chatterjee, asked the Government not to treat it as a ``routine
matter'' as the ``integrity'' of the country was involved. He
wondered why the Government was running away from an adjournment
motion when it had a majority.
Meanwhile, some members trooped into the ``well'' and as noisy
scenes prevailed the Speaker adjourned the House until 2 p.m. The
turmoil continued when the House re-assembled, with the CPI(M)'s
Mr. Basudeb Acharya in the Chair, and it was adjourned again
after tabling of papers. There was more commotion when the House
resumed at 4 p.m. forcing the Speaker to adjourn it for the day.
In the Rajya Sabha, Mr. Jethmalani sought to make out that the
Gujarat Government's decision was accepted by a large section of
State's people and said the Centre could not follow the example
of the State as it was a coalition government. ``Lifting the ban
on government employees to take part in RSS activities is not a
decision of the NDA Government. The coalition government at the
Centre will hold its horses till all partners agree''.
Mrs. Jayanti Natarajan quoted extensively from the RSS
constitution and the oath administered to its members to prove
her contention that the ideology and philosophy of the
organisation ran contrary to the letter and spirit of the
Constitution. The clout enjoyed by the RSS in the BJP Government
could be gauged from the fact that it brought out a special
supplement commending the Pokhran nuclear tests simultaneously
with the Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee's announcement
to the rest of the world.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Survey wants check on fiscal deficit | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|