|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Next
Acts of cruelty
I HAVE been patiently working my way through J.M. Coetzee's
oeuvre in an attempt to acquaint myself fully with this
extraordinary writer's work. This week, I will look at his first
work, Duskslands (Vintage), published when the author was in his
mid-thirties (he is now 60). That leaves four novels, In The
Heart Of The Country, Foe, Age Of Iron and The Master Of
Petersburg (according to the writer, Githa Hariharan, a friend of
his, the last one is an exceptional work) I shall hope to have
ready by the end of the year. But to return to Dusklands:
It comprises two long narratives, both told in the first person,
and in both of which the author makes an appearance rather like
Paul Auster uses himself as a character in his great first book,
The New York trilogy. The first long narrative purports to be
something called "The Vietnam Project", a diabolical scheme
concocted by the resident mavens at Psy Ops to win the war in
Indo-China. The author of the narrative is being supervised by
someone called Coetzee, whom he loathes, fears and admires. In
between ramblings about his supervisor, he constructs a nightmare
scenario that gives new meaning to psychological cruelty and
man's inhumanity to man. However accomplished, the first
narrative did not really hold my interest, being obscure and
overwritten and altogether too fanciful.
The second narrative (ostensibly an 18th Century memoir of an
ancestor of the author) more than makes up for the inadequacies
of the first. The narrative is divided into three parts - a first
person account by Jacobus Coetzee himself, edited, with an
afterword by J. M. Coetzee's father, S. J. Coetzee, and
translated by the author.
Although Dusklands is labelled a work of fiction by the
publishers, in a preface to the second narrative, J. M. Coetzee
states that he has translated a 1951 edition, entitled Het relaas
van Jacobus Coetzee, Janszoon, that was published by his father,
the late Dr. S. J. Coetzee, for the van Plettenberg society. This
would seem to suggest that the first of the three parts of the
narrative is non-fiction, a memoir authored by a living person. I
have no means of confirming this or whether the "memoir" of
Jacobus Coetzee is a fiction, and all the apparatus supporting
it, an elaborate literary device.
Whatever it is, it works and works brilliantly. The apparatus I
am referring to is the Afterword to Jacobus Coetzee's narrative
prepared by J. M. Coetzee's father, and an appendix, that is
Jacobus' official deposition about his 1760 expedition, in the
course of which he brought back to the outside world, the first
news of the giraffe, among other things.
The three sequences read together are a frightening testimonial
to the brutality man is able to visit on his fellow beings in the
name of bringing civilisation to primitive savages.
Jacobus Janszoon Coetzee is the grandson of Dirk Coetzee, a
Burgher "who emigrated from Holland to the Cape in 1976". He is a
dull, plodding man who decides to venture into the hinterland in
search of ivory and whatever other fortune he might find,
accompanied by his faithful Hottentot servants. Coetzee is a
fanatical believer in Christianity, which he believes separates
the civilised from the sub-human, but is otherwise a tough,
pragmatic pioneer who survives in a harsh country by a mixture of
shrewdness, unquestioning self-belief and heroic feats of
endurance. He is capable of the most bestial cruelty, if his
memoir is to be believed, wreaking ruthless vengeance on the
innocent Great Namqua people whose lands he violates, his
untrustworthy servants whom he kills out of hand, and a single
faithful follower, whom he abandons to his fate as soon as he
becomes a liability.
Jacobus Coetzee's doings, as described by himself, make him a fit
case for capital punishment in the slowest, most painful way
possible, but he does not, of course, see himself in that light.
As he writes: "What did the deaths of all these people achieve?
Through their deaths I, who after they had expelled me, had
wandered the desert like a pallid symbol, against which asserted
my reality. No more than any other man do I enjoy killing, but I
have taken it upon myself to be the one to pull the trigger,
performing this sacrifice for myself and my countrymen, who
exist, and committing upon the dark folk the murders we have all
wished. All are guilty, without exception, I include the
Hottentots. Who knows for what unimaginable crimes of the spirit
they died, through me? God's judgment is just, irreprehensible,
and incomprehensible. His mercy pays no heed to merit. I am a
tool in the hands of history ...."
After reading Dusklands I am more than ever convinced that J. M.
Coetzee is one of the greatest living writers we have. His
account of the lunatic Jacobus Coetzee is another feather in his
Tyrolean hat.
DAVID DAVIDAR
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Next : Clear and simple instructions | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|