|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Post-colonial India
ANGLO-INDIAN, a term first used in the 18th Century by Warren
Hastings to describe the British in India and their Indian-born
children, is now more commonly used to describe those people of
dual British-Indian heritage. Today, living outside the
mainstream of Indian society and often described as being caught
in a time-warp, the few Anglo-Indians of India are mostly
concentrated around the cities of Bangalore, Madras (Chennai),
Bombay (Mumbai), Calcutta, Lucknow and Cochin. They are a small,
often impoverished, minority, which some have estimated now to
number as few as 100,000 in a country of close to a billion. Many
of the remaining Anglo-Indians in India still cling to their own
rituals and customs, living close to one another, often
congregated around the local Christian church. Still a central
force in their lives, the church is a last remaining connection
and identification with the past. Anglo-Indians speak readily of
their English past, of the days when life was better, when you
could always get a decent cup of tea.
After Independence, a large wave of Anglo-Indian emigration took
place. Many wealthier Anglo-Indians went to Australia, New
Zealand, Canada and back "home" to England, seeking acceptance in
a Westernised setting. For them, India had become a foreign
country where their preoccupation with being British was often
met with hostility and rejection. Those Anglo-Indians left in
India were a relic of the British colonial past. Whatever
alliance they had with the British had become a distortion; a
historical handicap that could only be overcome with true
assimilation into modern India.
Brought into being by the policies of Portuguese, Dutch and
British colonists, the earliest Anglo-Indian community can be
traced back to the Portuguese who established a colony on the
Malabar Coast in 1498. Later, in the 17th Century, desiring
greater manpower to settle their colony in Madras and a
population which could negotiate local customs, the East India
Company paid a gold mohur for each child born to an Indian mother
and a European father.
During this initial period of colonisation, the Anglo-Indian
community flourished, holding a special status as a distinct
English-speaking and Christian community with knowledge of Indian
customs, Western values and, most importantly, a fierce loyalty
to their British progenitors. With all the conditions set for a
natural collaboration, the Anglo-Indians helped generate great
wealth for colonial purse-strings. The Anglo-Indians identified
with and were accepted by the British, enjoying many of the same
privileges and lifestyle. Under the prevailing philosophy that
conditions in India would never suit a British constitution,
Anglo-Indians were viewed as providing a needed "infusion of
native blood".
It was not until the latter part of the 18th Century that the
British began to turn against this community. By then, Anglo-
Indians had become so intertwined with their British masters that
they looked to England as their place of origin. Concerned with
purity of race, and alarmed by how large this hybrid community
had grown, the British watched with fear as native uprisings
occurred in Haiti and other areas, uprooting colonial rule. Swift
measures were taken to restrict the access that the Anglo-Indians
had been given. Anglo-Indian children could no longer be educated
in England and adults were excluded from obtaining positions with
the East India Company.
It was not until the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny that the situation turned
in favour of Anglo-Indians again. During the mutiny, when the
native Indian army vigorously turned against the British, the
Anglo-Indians fought loyally against their Indian brethren to
save British lives. Deeply shaken by this bloody and violent war,
the British never recovered the same level of trust in India.
They did, however, want to reward the Anglo-Indians for their
loyalty. New positions in the public services were offered and
schools based on British principals were established for their
children. Jobs were offered in the railways, post and telegraphs,
nursing, customs and police, but were given with the caveat that
employment was only restricted to the lower grades of the
service, with no opportunity for advancement. Anglo-Indians were
to be rewarded but still had to be kept in their place.
By the 20th Century, the strange psychological drift of a people
alternately accepted and rejected was deeply engrained. Exclusion
of Indians from jobs in the professional sphere left an educated
and motivated population frustrated and with a low self-esteem.
Poverty and unemployment became serious problems for the Anglo-
Indian community. Discriminated against and isolated from the
rest of India, the Anglo-Indian profile was a painfully lonely
one. Struggling to maintain a European standard as a visible
means of their identity, Anglo-Indians continued to seek a life
that was self-defeating. The issue of skin colour, always of
great significance, was ever more important to the Anglo-Indian.
A whiter Anglo-Indian could "pass" as British, whereas a darker-
skinned Anglo-Indian might be denied the rightful passage of his
dual heritage, the same dubious heritage which he struggled to
overcome.
ALEXANDRA VIETS
* * *
Synopsis
Set in post-colonial India of the 1950s, Cotton Mary is the story
of two Anglo-Indian (part English and part Indian) sisters,
Cotton Mary and Blossom, their niece Rosie, and their tangled and
complicated interactions with a British family.
As the BBC correspondent stationed in Kerala, South India, on a
special assignment, John Macintosh is absent when the screenplay
begins with the premature birth for a "special" child to his
wife, Lily, in an old British army hospital. On the night of
Vishu, Theresa Macintosh, the seven-year-old daughter is left to
find her way through the town and to the local hospital for help.
Staffed by Anglo-Indian nurses, including Cotton Mary and Rosie,
the hospital sets the stage for the first part of the film. A
crisis arises since Lily is unable to breast-feed her child.
Despite efforts from the hospital staff, the child is close to
death when Cotton Mary comes to the rescue by stealing the child
away to her crippled sister Blossom, who is a wet nurse in a
nearby Alms house. Still living in the past when her life was
peopled by ladies of the Raj and their children - and remembering
the time when the Alms house was a vital part of the Anglican
church, Blossom and the other Alms house ladies are revived,
their status vindicated by having a new "White" child in their
midst. The long hallucinatory night, intercut with scenes of
Theresa lost in the dramatic, and often frightening, Vishu
festivities, finally comes to an end when Blossom's milk saves
the child. The success that Mary has in arranging for the feeding
of the baby makes her indispensable to Lily, who offers her a
permanent position in her home as an "ayah" (or nanny).
Once she is inside the house, Mary's relationship to the baby and
her burgeoning friendship with Lily give her a unique position
from which to operate. Lily embraces Mary and delegates more and
more of her responsibilities to Mary as her own eccentricities
and lack of interest in motherhood absent her from the family.
Unhappy with the companionship of the very traditional expatriate
community, and emotionally distanced from her husband, Lily
withdraws to her garden and into herself. Gradually, Mary usurps
the powers of the loyal family servant,Abraham, whom she accuses
of stealing, and more importantly, of being "dirty". Ultimately
she is able to push Abraham out and replace him as the Master's
"right hand man". Boasting to the other ayahs that Master is
building her a house in England "near Wellington Castle", Mary
begins to achieve the identity she desires.
As Mary continues to insinuate herself, her friend Rosie,
beautiful and pale-skinned, also managed to win her way into the
British home by concentrating her attentions on John Macintosh.
Determined to get the life she wants, Rosie betrays Mary's
confidence in her and plays along with the idea that she is
helping Master with his "work". Drawn to Rosie's beauty and the
gradual, but determined, detachment of his wife, John turns to
Rosie as his lover.
Meanwhile, Mary's sister Blossom continues to feed the newborn
baby and becomes increasingly frustrated by the lack of attention
paid to her efforts. In the final of rebellion, Mary responds to
Blossom's repeated demands that Madam visit her by "becoming" the
Madam herself. She is momentarily triumphant as she strides into
the Alms' house, her hair newly coiffed, dressed in Madam's
clothes, and wearing Madam's shoes.
In the dramatic conclusion, which exposes each of the main
characters' often conflicting English and Indian identities,
desperation and betrayal lead the sisters, Blossom and Mary, to
attack each other's aspirations. The Alms house ladies taunt Mary
and reveal the truth about Rosie's relationship with John. As
Lily returns to England with the children, John also rejects
Rosie.
Mary is left, unable to reconcile her identity, her hopes in
ruins and half-mad.
Cotton Mary,
Ismail Merchant, Penguin,
Rs. 250.
"Cotton Mary" is Alexandra Viets' first feature length
screenplay.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Clear and simple instructions Next : Essays on natural history | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|