|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, March 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
'Work' at home
HOMEWORK has always been the subject of much debate and
discussion with the votes against and for it being almost evenly
balanced depending on what is often politically correct. But
there seems to be no clearcut answer to whether children need
that "daily dose" of homework or not.
To most children of course, it is anathema. Many cannot
understand why after spending a gruelling day at school they have
to bring work back home.
Interestingly, a group of academics at the University of Durham,
London, found that most 11-year-olds who did the most homework
gained lower test scores in maths, science and reading than
children who were set homework only once a month. This was a
follow up to a study by King's College, London, which observed
that nine year olds who did maths homework once or twice a week
did no better than those who tackled it occasionally.
I can almost hear irate parents thumping their chests and
teachers looking cross. But in all fairness one has to examine
both sides to the issue.
Do we really need all this homework? Despite the talk of
liberalising education, of taking away the burden of forced
learning by rote on children by asking teachers to create an
atmosphere of creativity in classrooms, homework still remains a
major issue. As one eight-year-old who takes home the usual
weekend homework rued: "It seems that ma'am thinks we have
nothing better to do. We get Maths, English and Hindi and then we
also have project work." That of course takes care of parents'
weekends too. Today, homework has become a major part of the
literacy initiative in primaries in the hope that eventually, it
will help raise falling standards of education.
Whether this will really happen or not remains to be seen.
Homework may be the butt of much ridicule but there are some
aspects of it that most parents, teachers and the government seem
to agree on. One is that it should reinforce skills and
understanding, to be a continuation of what is being taught in
the class and which finally leads to independent learning skills.
Ideally, it should make for close cooperation between parents and
teachers. Eventually, the biggest challenge lies in making this
task as creative as possible and this is where the drwabacks
occur. Like teaching, homework too is treated as a routine - to
be done with and got out of the way.
The time spent on homework seems to be the uppermost thing in the
teacher's mind as homework is marked rather than the emphasis
being made on the quality of tasks that are being set. Of course
there are no specific guidelines that the education authorities
have worked out. But an interesting study in the West suggests
that an hour a week of homework is enough for five to six year
olds, 90 minutes for seven to eight year olds and 30 minutes a
day for 10 to 11 year olds. As the age increases, so does the
study time to be spent at home. In the end, it is up to the child
to decide how to tackle their subject.
The most important ingredient is to use imagination. Setting
tasks means that children must be allowed to use informal
resources easily available. Faced with the dilemma of homework,
one teacher has an interesting story to tell. On an average day,
in his class, at least five to six hands go up - the homework has
not been done. Gradually the number goes up. This includes the
ridiculous reasons given. A sample: "I am sorry, Sir, I could not
do my homework because my little sister was too ill and my mum
was too busy to help. When my dad came home he was a bit drunk
and mum and he had this awful row. I was sent to bed when I asked
if someone could help me." Yet another one: "I could not do my
homework because my worm is very sick and I was distraught."
However differentiated home work might be, for some children it
will always remain a necessary evil which can lead to poor
learning and pressures that teenagers can do without. According
to this teacher, as soon as a class is given work, the school
sends a message that it does not make for a oneness of response
from the students. There will always be those for whom it is no
big deal. For some, the task set might eventually create a
permanent schism in his/her attitude towards learning, maybe due
to a dissonance in the home environment. Just as there will
always be students who excel, there will always be parents who
are not interested in helping their children - some may genuinely
have no time, others may not know the subject well enough. Is
that not discrimination?
This is one view. On the other hand there are teachers who feel
that homework can be a useful tool in bringing about a more
positive home-school relationship, with homework being a good
guide, from the point of view of parents getting to know what
their children are doing. Indeed, in senior school this is one
grouse that most parents have - they just do not have a clue
about what their children are doing - specially when it comes to
the classroom.
Most parents find that they are at sea since their children will
not deign it necessary to tell them very much on a daily basis.
"The whole truth stumbles out when there is a crisis, usually
around examination time. By then it is pretty late to really
help," says a parent.
Homework should be used by teachers to encourage children to
develop finer skills - mainly, that they should learn to reflect
on what they may have learnt. Homework should be balanced so that
it does not stop children from participating in other activities
once home. Football or tennis is just as important to a youngster
as his mathematical abilities/skills.
SUCHITRA BEHAL
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Reading, an aesthetic experience Next : Picture of contrasts | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|