|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, March 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Lance Klusener bridles Pakistan
By G. Viswanath
SHARJAH, MARCH 24. There were kudos all around for Imran Nazir.
He is the new Pakistani boy who has come to the big stage of
international cricket. He is not exactly a newcomer. He made his
first appearance in the Pepsi triangular last year at
Vishakapatnam against Sri Lanka. He came and left the scene
leaving nothing as an impression, but a single digit figure of
six runs in two matches. But the Gujranwala born Nazir with a
boyish face and bushy eyebrows might see his luck last longer the
second time.
(According to late agency reports, South Africa defeated Pakistan
by three wickets with 5.3 overs to spare. This is South Africa's
second straight victory in the tournament. Lance Klusener was
adjudged the Man of the Match for his five-wicket haul.)
What is certain about his cricket is that he is a talented, nay
gifted, batsman. He showed his class in plenty in the third match
of the Coca Cola Cup tri-series against the South Africans. While
the youngest player in the tri-series sustained Pakistan's push
for nearly two and half hours and earned praise, it was a South
African nicknamed `Zulu' who bowled ten overs on the trot to pick
up his sixth five wicket haul in eighty matches and upset
Pakistan's apple cart.
Lance Klusener's smart piece of accurate bowling with a good
content of pace dashed Pakistan's hopes of entering the second
phase of the tournament with two points. What they managed was
196, a far cry from a substantial and pose as a challenging one
for the South Africans.
The start to Friday's game looked odd for more reasons than one.
The tradition of putting on board an India - Pakistan clash was
done away with in last April. The organisers have their own
argument, but it has failed to convince the expatriates who
believe that cricket on Friday ought to be between the Asian
giants. The South Africa was to play Pakistan was reflected in
the poor turn out on the weekly holiday. Then, Pakistan had to
leave out - Wasim Akram and Shoaib Akhtar because of niggling
groin trouble. The South Africans, too, had to pick Mornantau
Hayward, for Shaun Pollock, because the allrounder's knee was not
in good shape and holding well to bowl ten overs. Everyone looked
relaxed except for Pakistan for which it was sort of `must win'
match day.
The pitch on which the first match of the tri-series was played
on Wednesday appeared to have improved. Obviously the groundstaff
had taken care to make sure that there was some bounce and a
predictable one at that. It is debatable whether Moin Khan's
decision to bat was right or wrong, but going against the
conventional would have given time to assess and more importantly
the target his team would have to score to win the match. Perhaps
he was confident that his batsmen would come good in their second
outing. The absence of Saeed Anwar, who tops the batting averages
here and scored the maximum number of centuries, was a big
handicap for Pakistan. The task was formidable for the new pair
in Shahid Afridi and Nazir against a new ball attack which did
not have big names like Allan Donald and Pollock. This must have
been another factor that must have prompted Moin Khan to bat
first.
Pakistan's record against South Africa is not as good. They have
lost 15 of the 22 which meant that they had to rise above their
best. Afridi came here with a hundred internationals under his
belt, but not with the reputation he had built after he hit the
fastest century in Nairobi some years ago.
The South Africans, being a witness to that rampaging innings by
Afridi, knew the ways and means to contain Afridi, who in his
three previous matches against the South Africans had scored only
40 runs and had picked three wicket at over 52. Afridi's only
aggressive shot was a cut he made of Hayward after which he
spooned a catch to Neil McKenzie at extra cover.
The batsman who replaced Afridi was Younis Khan. Pakistan's plan
became obvious the moment Nazir began to play shots and Younis
decided to defend and rotate the strike. The feature of the
second wicket stand of the brilliant stroke play of Nazir. He
played the line and length exceptionally well and appeared to
have time to play his shots. He began with a back foot drive off
Steve Elworthy.
The worrying thing was a leg injury to Nazir that developed after
20 overs. This necessitated a runner. Nazir did not give the
slightest impression that he was under pressure.
Instead he looked a confident at the very outset and even showed
he has strength in his shoulders when he hit three huge sixes.
He never let go a chance unpunished. The only time he came close
to be dismissed was when he was on 60, but Klusener's delivery
was declared a no ball.
The partnership was beginning to dominate when Klusener, who has
had a fair amount of success against Pakistan, bowled Nazir. The
young right hander had a stroke of luck when Gary Kirsten caught
him on the line at long on, but failed to control the catch. The
moment he realised he was going to cross the line, Kirsten threw
the ball back on to the field. Peter Manual who had committed a
blunder declaring a six, consulted the third umpire and withdrew
his decision.
The second wicket stand between Nazir and Younis Khan produced
115 runs, but it also consumed three balls short of 37 overs.
Younis Khan perished soon to Klusener who literally tore through
the Pakistan middle order. His five wicket haul was not the best
effort, but he had made sure that Pakistan would not even post
200 runs on the board.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Piket on a hot trail Next : A spirited comeback | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|