|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, March 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Preserving a monument
Sir, - An ancient temple of Eswar was located at the confluence
of the rivers Krishna, Thungabhadra and Bhavanasi, near
Sangameswaram village in Kurnool district. When the Srisailam
project was under construction, the then Government took a
decision to shift the temple to a safer place. The intention of
the Government was laudable, but it bungled while implementing
the scheme. The first mistake was to shift the temple to a far-
off place, atop a hillock near Kurnool, a distance of about 40 km
from the original site.
The second was the dismantling and transporting of the whole
material to a far-off place, instead of having it photographed,
videographed, sketched to the actual measurements and
computerised to build a new temple in its original shape in a
nearby area, at a much cheaper cost.
Nevertheless, the entire temple was dismantled, dismembered and
the heavy stone material, including statues, stone-carvings,
sculptures, wall-panels, pillars, huge beams, and each and every
piece of stone, were transported to the new site. Even ordinary
stones, big and small with no artistic value, had been
transported to the new site at an enormous cost. During the
process of dismantling, each piece of stone was numbered in
serial order.
When the new temple was completed, it was astoundingly identical
to the original structure. It was really an engineering marvel,
and the engineers, architects and even the ordinary workers did a
meticulous and magnificent job in retaining the original form and
shape of the archaic structure. Some crores of public money had
been spent on the project, only to be abandoned in its final
stages.
Instead, the authorities should have gracefully allowed the
temple to be submerged, along with scores of other villages and
temples, in the back waters of the Srisailam project and thus
saved whopping amount of the public exchequer, inasmuch as the
temple was put to disuse since ages on account of its remoteness
to civilisation and part of the temple was already submerged in
the perilous waters of the confluence, and remained only as a
relic of a bygone era.
The new temple has now become the habitat for bats, spiders,
reptiles and other insects, and also a rendezvous for criminals,
fugitives and other shady characters.
It is disheartening to see that some of the priceless art pieces
such as stone statues, sculptures, and carvings, some intact and
many broken or disfigured, lay scattered along with stones and
rubble all around the place, unprotected and uncared for. These
things, at least, should have been preserved in the nearby
archaeological museum.
Even now, the place can be developed into a pilgrim centre or a
tourist attraction by laying an asphalt road between the national
highway No. 18 and the temple, a stretch of hardly 3 km, and
raising greenery around the temple. The Religious and Endowment
Department should do something to improve matters.
V. Janakiram,
Kurnool (AP)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Pak. at the crossroads Next : Former PMs | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classified |
Employment |
Features |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|