|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, April 11, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Resentment over Wahid remarks
By P. S. Suryanarayana
SINGAPORE, APRIL 10. The Indonesian President, Mr. Abdurrahman
Wahid, now on a foreign tour, came under political fire at home
today, with some of his critics even suggesting that he was
running the risk of being ``impeached'' by the people.
The Speaker of the House of Representatives (DPR), Mr. Akbar
Tandjung, said that Cabinet Ministers should not be sacked on
mere presumption of wrongdoing. The President could dismiss
Ministers on grounds of corruption only if they were proven
guilty of such practice, Mr. Akbar suggested, in response to Mr.
Wahid's assertions, while in Pretoria, that some of his Ministers
were obstructing Indonesia's economic reforms by acting in their
self-interest and not the public good.
Although Mr. Akbar conceded the President's prerogative to remove
Ministers, the Speaker cautioned Mr. Wahid that he and his
Government ``may face a sort of impeachment from the people if
(the present) social unrest continues to escalate'' at home. The
social unrest in focus is the rising tide of public anger,
especially from the Islamist quarters in Muslim-majority
Indonesia, over Mr. Wahid's move to re-legalise the country's
proscribed Communist Party (PKI).
A strand of opinion in Jakarta's political circles is that Mr.
Wahid has at present sought to play the PKI card, as it were, in
order to put pressure on the U.S. and the International Monetary
Fund to extend economic help to Indonesia. However, this
(suspected) tactic was only alienating the Muslims besides being
contrary to Indonesia's State principles, according to Mr.
Wahid's critics.
As for Mr. Wahid's latest hint, in remarks made in Pretoria,
about the possibility of some Cabinet changes, a view among his
political opponents was that the President might effect the
shuffle while still being abroad at this time in much the same
way as he had, during a previous long foreign tour, asked Gen.
Wiranto to resign from the Cabinet. In the event, Gen. Wiranto
was suspended from the Cabinet, not sacked, after Mr. Wahid
returned to Jakarta on that occasion. The President's critics
have now argued that he could similarly ``decommission''
Ministers suspected of corruption until they could be proved
either guilty or innocent in a due judicial process.
The main thrust of Mr. Wahid's anger with some of his Cabinet
Ministers, especially those dealing with economic portfolios, is
that they have not done sufficient work to secure the release of
suspended aid from the IMF.
On the positive side for Mr. Wahid at this time, he won
assurances from his South African hosts about help in organising
an Indonesian truth and reconciliation commission. This idea went
down well with some of Mr. Wahid's critics including Mr. Akbar.
The Attorney General's Office today went to the residence of the
former President, Gen. Suharto, in Jakarta to pick up the threads
of interrogation from where these were left during a previous
such visit by State prosecutors to his house.
Gen Suharto, now under preliminary scrutiny for his alleged
accumulation of ill-gotten wealth through charitable foundations
linked to him and his family, did not respond to summons from the
Attorney General's Office for questioning. As his lawyers cited
the failing health of the former President for this, the new
practice of interrogating him at his residence is being resorted
to.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Anti-Prodi campaign may yield little Next : Kim's sunshine policy pays off | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|