|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, April 15, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
START-II a boost to Putin
By Vladimir Radyuhin
MOSCOW, APRIL 14. The Russian Parliament has ratified the START-
II nuclear arms reduction treaty, seven years after it was signed
by Russia and the United States and four years after the U.S.
Congress approved the pact.
The Lower House, State Duma, voted 288 to 133 to approve the
treaty, which calls for halving U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals
to a maximum of 3,500 warheads by 2007. Communists and their
allies, Agrarians, opposed the treaty, saying it would fatally
weaken Russia and give the United States a huge military
advantage, but leftists had lost majority in the Lower House in
the last elections in December. The treaty will now go to the
Upper House, the Federation Council, which is certain to approve
it as early as next week.
Ratification of START-II is a major political boost to Russia's
President-elect, Mr. Vladimir Putin, ahead of his first foreign
trip to Britain this weekend. Mr. Putin has demonstrated his full
control over the Russian Parliament, which puts him in favourable
contrast to his predecessor, Mr. Boris Yeltsin, whose eternal
conflict with the Lower House blocked many legislative
initiatives of the Kremlin. Approval of START-II gives Moscow a
new bargaining point in opposing Washington's pressure to modify
the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty to allow the U.S. to
deploy a national missile defence system.
START-II also opens the way to negotiations on deeper cuts in
U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals under a START-III accord.
Advocates of START-II argued that Russia needed the treaty more
than the U.S. did, because Russian ageing ballistic missiles were
being phased out even faster than envisaged by START-II as their
guaranteed service life ran out.
``Ratification of the treaty will enable Russia to maintain its
deterrent potential,'' Mr. Putin told deputies shortly before the
vote today. ``If START-II is not ratified Russia will lag behind
the U.S. in retaliation capability by a factor of 15.'' At the
same time, he warned that Russia would pull out of all nuclear
and conventional arms control agreements if the United States
does not adhere to the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
``I want to stress that in this case we will withdraw not only
from the START II treaty, but from the whole system of treaties
on limitation and control of strategic and conventional
weapons,'' Mr. Putin said.
Along with START-II, Russian deputies approved a statement that
reserved Russia's right to withdraw from START-II if the U.S.
violated the ABM treaty by deploying a national missile defence.
Critics of START-II said there was no chance the treaty would be
implemented because Washington was certain to go ahead with its
plan to build a national ABM system.
``The strategic parity between Russia and the United States will
cease to exist if we implement START II and the United States
deploys its anti-ballistic missile defence,'' Mr. Ivan
Safranchuk, an arms control expert, cautioned.
However, proponents of START-II said Russia's new Topol-M
ballistic missile was capable of overcoming any ABM system the
U.S. could build.
``It is always more promising to build offensive rather than
defensive systems,'' said Mr. Roman Popkovich, the President's
adviser on defence affairs. ``One can always build attack weapons
that will penetrate defence systems.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : New U.N. inspection team for Iraq Next : Hung Assembly but S. Korea says yes to change | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|