|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, April 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
Poor record of private members' Bills
By A. Jayaram
BANGALORE, APRIL 16. Journalists who have been covering the
proceedings of the two Houses of the Legislature for long have
not failed to notice the decline in the number of legislators who
are capable of threadbare discussion of the Bills introduced by
the Government.
There is hardly any clause-by-clause discussion, and the members
indulge in generalities. There is also a dearth of members who
are capable of finding fault with the drafting of the Bills.
Needless to say, the members can find fault with the Law
Department officials if they are capable of critical analysis of
the Bills. The Legislature has a very poor record in the matter
of private members' Bills and resolutions. For at least a decade
now, not a single MLA or MLC in the State has introduced a
private member's Bill. What more, only two private members'
resolutions have been placed before the two Houses for
consideration in the last 25 years. One of the few MLAs who could
go into the nitty-gritty of Bills was Mr. H. Ekanthaiah, who was
a member of the ninth Assembly, and Mr. H. N. Nanje Gowda and Ms.
Pramila Nesargi of the BJP in the last Assembly.
The two resolutions were the one introduced in the Legislative
Council by the independent member from Mysore, Prof.
M.Sathyanarayana Rao, representing teachers, during 1970-76. It
had called for the nationalisation of all private educational
institutions. Though the Bill was taken up for discussion on some
days, it was never completed and he ceased to be a member. Prof.
Sathyanarayana Rao was elected again to the Council in 1982, but
he did not press the resolution again.
The last Assembly (Tenth) had before it a private member's
resolution from Mr. Vatal Nagaraj calling for the introduction of
Prohibition in the State. It was a hardy item on the agenda of
the House fixed for Fridays, but was hardly discussed. It may be
mentioned that the two Houses of the Legislature have been
allotting 30 minutes time every Friday for private members'
business. Both of them have a separate committee on Private
Members' Bills and Resolutions. In the Assembly, it is headed by
the Deputy Speaker, Mr. Manohar H.Tahsildar.
The Committee recently presented a report on the functioning of
similar panels in Parliament and some of the State Legislatures-
Delhi, Punjab and Himachal Pradesh. One of the important
recommendations of the 11-member committee is that its members
should be selected from among MLAs who have knowledge of law and
especially those who have been ministers in the past. The other
two recommendations are rather mundane, that the members of the
committee should also be enabled to serve on other legislature
committees and each MLA should be allotted a constituency
development fund of Rs. one crore a year.
The Chief Minister, Mr. S. M. Krishna, has already promised to
consider providing such funds to legislators to develop their
constituencies.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : APCC chief lashes out at Jairam Ramesh Next : Jains told to adopt a village in each dt. | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|