|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, April 20, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
| Previous
| Next
Who is the badshah among browsers?
A preview version of Netscape's browser has just been released
even as experts size up a `beta' of Microsoft's next upgrade of
`Internet Explorer'. Anand Parthasarathy assesses the promised
new features of the two major contenders - and checks out a
cheeky challenger.
YOU WANT to send an urgent email to a business associate on the
east coast of the U.S. As you type your message using `Netscape
Mail', you notice that it's almost midnight.
That would make it about 9.30 in the morning in New Jersey, where
the clocks have been set forward for spring. Your friend usually
looks at his email around this time - an hour after getting in to
his office. Could he be ``online'' at this very moment?
You decide to check - and look up his name in the ``Buddy'' list
that pops up on your screen. Hitting the key fetches his email
address from the memory and Netscape's Instant Messenger takes
over and checks whether the recipient is online.
By luck he is - so you swing into ``instant'' mode and your
message pops up on his screen. Soon the two of you are exchanging
messages to and fro - many with documents attached - till the
details of your business deal are honed.
It would have taken a week of emails to sort out the issues in
the old way.
``Instant'' messaging has been around for a year from both the
major Internet browsers, Netscape's Communicator and Microsoft's
Internet Explorer. But the upcoming new release of Netscape 6
merges this feature so seamlessly with the Mail programme, that
you can switch over to ``live'' exchanges anytime your mail
addressee is simultaneously available on the Net. All this at the
cost of a local telephone call.
An Internet browser used to be a barebones programme that served
as the front end to the World Wide Web. To view a site one typed
the URL or Universal Resource Locator, the well known www dot com
format, in the locator field of the browser - which then did the
rest: locating the server at the address provided by you and
establishing the link to your computer.
Today this type of navigation tool is only one of a slate of
features offered by the bigger browsers: at the very least, they
provide a free email service; remember the addresses of your most
used contacts; accelerate searches using multiple search engines;
allow you to ``customize'' your browser by clothing it with
``skins'' of your choice; ``push'' pre selected Net content to
your computing platform or alternatively reject unsolicited mail
(the result of what is called ``spamming'') and deny access to
unwanted ``cookies'' - mini programmes that wriggle into your
machine uninvited.
``Mosaic'' was the only browser available in the pioneering days
of the Internet - but today the two ``big boys'' among Web
browsers are Netscape and Explorer.
Netscape's Navigator was omnipresent till the challenger,
Microsoft, unveiled Explorer - and in a canny commercial move,
offered it free of charge. It soon captured over three-fourths of
the browser market, a position further strengthened when it
bundled Explorer with its ubiquitous desktop and portable
operating system, ``Windows''.
Indeed, this marrying of the two environments - desktop and
Internet by a seamless marriage of Windows to Explorer, was at
the core of the celebrated court case where many U.S. states
joined to challenge Microsoft's allegedly monopolistic ways.
The April 3 finding of the U.S. court agreed that the bundling
was more in Microsoft's commercial interest than the customers -
but an appeal has been launched.
Legal issues and Microsoft's motives apart, the fact remains that
today the customer expects - nay, demands - that any computing
platform: desktop, portable or wireless device, provide instant
access to the Internet.
On April 6, America On Line (AOL) who bought Netscape in 1998,
announced the imminent release of a new version. After almost two
years of minor ``point releases'' (4.5, 4.6, 4.7), they dropped a
digit and unveiled the first ``pre release version'', of Netscape
6. ``PR 1'' was available last week for free download - and is
expected to be followed by PR 2 and 3 before the main release of
Netscape 6 in the last quarter of this year.
One of the notable deviations from the past in the new Netscape
is the adherence to the new ``open source'' standards that are
emerging - Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML 4.0), Extended Markup
Language (XML), Cascading Style Sheets (CCS 2), Document Object
Model (DOM), Java 2 and Javascript 1.5. The new browser engine
which drives the application is Netscape's nod to the ``open''
mantra, where it encourages third parties to add value to the
browser. The engine is codenamed ``Gecko'', a successor of its
open source initiative, ``Mozilla''.
Unlike competitor Microsoft which was slammed last week for non
adherence to global standards, Netscape 6 claims compatibility
with all standards for Internet content and access, promoted by
the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Accordingly the new version
runs under Windows, MacOS or Linux.
There are a fistful of new features breathlessly listed in the
specifications sheets that can be found on the Netscape site.
Many users like this correspondent have hitherto found it wiser
to keep both browsers IE and Netscape active on their desktops
and switching from one to the other, because each had its
eccentricities and strong points.
Such users will find that some of the so called ``new features''
are new only to Netscape. Others will be meaningful only to AOL
subscribers in the U.S.
For example, much is made of the new ``search'' capability -
Netscape has tied up with a very efficient search engine, called
``Google''.
In fact the last update of Internet Explorer (5.0) inaugurated an
equally good search facility driven by Altavista and a search
engine called ``Virage''. Netscape had a ``What's Related''
button on the URL line but this usually threw up the most absurd
content. Now it is only just catching up.
Netscape's ``Instant Messenger'' was a big hit since it was
launched with version 4.7. Now going online with email with the
addressee has become even easier because this feature has been
merged with the mail box. Internet Explorer has some catching up
to do on this front.
The new Netscape feature ``My Sidebar'' is an eye wash: it
enables the user to concentrate all the access buttons of
choicein a vertical bar on the left hand side of the page and
have things like news headlines or stock market quotes flashing
even as one is viewing other content on the rest of the page.
If one recalls, Explorer's Search feature or Explorer bar worked
just like this.
One worthwhile add-on is the auto-translation feature which when
invoked, translates the content in a foreign language site.
However the languages are restricted to the usual European
alternatives - French, Spanish, German, Italian, Portuguese and a
few flavours of Japanese and Chinese.
I don't see this happening too soon with devanagiri or other
Indian script languages where special fonts are involved.
Netscape would not be bothered.
Another goody for Netscape users is the ``Composer'' feature
where you can generate text and pictures using HTML - useful when
you want to send such content as email attachments - they make
for much smaller files than bulky word processor output.
Perhaps more than the fistful of feature add-ons in Netscape 6,
is its sheer size - it is Netscape Communicator 4.72 after a
stringent diet.
The size of a bare bones system is claimed to be only 8 MB -
though I think a usable configuration exploiting all the new
features, would occupy atleast 15 MB. Netscape has thrown away
some of the excess baggage - features that were rarely used, like
``Netcaster''.
In comparison the current Explorer is a heavy disk guzzler -
taking up something like 30 MB of hard disk.
Internet Explorer: beta stage
The whizzkids at Microsoft haven't been sitting around either.
A few weeks ago, they released a first beta or test version of
the 3rd and last Windows upgrade: Windows Me (for millennium).
Tucked into this product was a beta of the new Internet Explorer
5.5. Support for some new standards is promised including CCS and
Dynamic HTML.
What Netscape did with its mail server and instant messenger,
Explorer does with Outlook and MSN Messenger: marry the two.
Possibly the best new feature will be Explorer's ``Print
Preview'' option where you can see how web pages you have
downloaded will print - and most usefully - how many pages they
will take.
I have often printed out web pages blind - then ended up finding
that a document takes up umpteen pages - most of which are
useless to me. I cannot think of a feature I would welcome more.
Sizewise, the new Explorer does not offer any signs of slimming:
typical install sizes could be up to 40 MB.
And there's the rub: browsers have become so bloated that many
users are irritated by how much space they occupy - and
consequently , how sluggish they have become.
Indians in particular have learned to appreciate the merits of a
compact, fast browser, because they pay twice over for their
surfing time - once to the Internet Service Provider (ISP) and
again to the telephone department.
They may like some of the new features in the upcoming versions
of the two browser badshahs. But they are unlikely to break out
in an ecstasy of delight. More likely they will say:
``Your stuff is great. Now, go back to the drawing board, guys,
and give us a product which does all this - at twice the speed
and in half the size.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech Previous : Question Corner Next : Where small is (still) beautiful | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|