|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, May 01, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Pak. policy on 'jehadi' forces not clear
By Amit Baruah
ISLAMABAD, APRIL 30. Will Pakistan quietly prevent the ``jehadi''
elements from crossing the Line of Control this summer? Or, will
it persist with the policy of let's-continue-to-bleed-India-in-
Kashmir?
As with most things in Pakistan, there is no ``one'' answer to
this question. One leading light of an Islamabad think- tank said
Pakistan would take steps to stop the ``jehadis'' crossing the
LoC. The Government, bowing to international opinion, would
exercise restraint.
In line with this approach, there have even been statements from
the Foreign Minister, Mr. Abdul Sattar, to the foreign media.
Whether such statements are for Western consumption alone, or
they reflect a departure from past practice, is a question that
needs to be answered.
Last year, around this time, Pakistani troops had occupied the
heights of Kargil and were preparing for a confrontation with
India. Though unacknowledged and repeatedly denied, every one
knows it was the Pakistani Army and not the so- called mujahideen
who fought Indian forces in Kargil.
On account of the Kargil operation, Pakistan today finds itself
on the mat as far as international opinion is concerned. By not
allowing infiltrators through, will Pakistan seek to refurbish
its image that took such a battering last summer?
This question is also linked to the issue of how much control the
Pakistani Government through its intelligence agencies has over
the militant groups. Some analysts believe it is as simple as
``turning off the tap'' while others say it will be too expensive
to ``crack down'' on these groups. The large mujahideen corps
raised by Pakistani intelligence would have to be ``retired'' or
``pensioned off''.
Using behind-the-scenes manoeuvres, the new ``leader'' of the
``jehad'', Masood Azhar, chief of his own Jaish-i- Muhammad, has
been kept quiet, showing that the Pakistani intelligence has its
own capabilities when it comes to acting against ``unwanted''
persons.
An ``ulema'' convention attended by leading ``jehadi groups'' on
April 27 at Muridke near Lahore said the Government should avoid
taking action against ``jehad and mujahideen'', under pressure
from foreign propaganda.
Clearly, the Musharraf Government has to make up its mind. Its
publicly declared position that it was ready to hold talks with
India anywhere and at any level can only have a meaning when it
reins in the jehadis.
The political-intelligence establishment might or might not have
total control over the jehadi elements. But, in one area at
least, they can act decisively if they choose to do so. They can
prevent the militants from crossing the LoC. Without the support
of the establishment, the ``jehadis'' can never hope to get
across.
The Musharraf regime holds the key to reducing the violence in
Kashmir. Whether or not it chooses to do so remains an open
question.
Other analysts believe Pakistan would first have to ``alter'' its
Kashmir policy. Only then can the ``mujahideen'' from Punjab and
the Frontier province, be sent home.
Will the coming weeks and months show that Pakistan, after
exhausting itself in the game to wrest Kashmir militarily, now
appreciates the benefits of a less interventionist, if not a non-
interventionist policy in the Valley and adjoining areas?
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Jaswant assurance to Kadirgamar Next : Expedite Jayalalitha case, CBI tells Channel Island court | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|