|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, May 01, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Regional
| Previous
| Next
'Persecution' of minorities: Reports not true, says Rajagopal
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, APRIL 30. The Union Minister of State for Law
and Justice, Mr. O. Rajagopal, has said that the reports about
violence against minorities in Uttar Pradesh and Delhi are not
true to facts.
The Union Minister told a press conference here today that the
Minorities Commission, which had inquired into the incidents, had
found that the incidents had no communal overtones. The attack on
Fr. Thomas and a school maid, the Commission had found, was a
case of robbery. The attackers had decamped with Rs. 1 lakh, a
camera and two tape recorders. Another case reported from Uttar
Pradesh was purely a law and order problem and the Vicar General
of Agra had said that he was satisfied with the security cover
provided after the incident. Yet another incident reported from
Riwadi was a case of road accident.
Mr. Rajagopal said the resolution adopted by the CPI(M) Central
committee last week criticising the attack was aimed at creating
anxiety among the minorities. Several quarters were trying to
create a wedge between the Hindus and the minorities through
propaganda.
He said the Central Committee should be leaving the decision on
the `grand alliance' to the Congress(I). It was warning the
Congress(I) that the CPI(M) would not consider it a secular party
if it formed the grand alliance. One wondered who authorised the
CPI(M) to determine whether a party was communal. Instead of
making such declarations, the party should be saying when the
Muslim League would cease to be a communal party, he teased.
While some Congressmen think that protection of the interests of
Ms. Sonia Gandhi was their prime duty, Congressmen in West Bengal
and Kerala thought that protection of democracy and freeing the
people from the misrule by the CPI(M)-led Governments were
important.
He said the propaganda that the targeted public distribution
system harmed the poor was contrary to facts. It would bring down
the money the poor was paying in the past for 20 kg of rice in a
month from Rs. 155 to Rs. 118.
However, the new system would affect merchants and politicians
engaged in diverting subsidised rice from ration shops. The
Central Government could not subsidise rice for all as it was
burdened by heavy debt accumulated during the Congress(I) rule.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Regional Previous : Athre, 5 of family drowned Next : 'Hindu-Christian dialogue' proposed | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|