|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, May 16, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Lack of responsibility
Sir, - Lately one cannot help but feel that all wings of the
Government have lost a sense of their responsibilities, powers
and duties.
There is a moving advertisement in the papers in which a young
girl exhorts her mother not to buy goods wrapped in polythene as
they are injurious to the child's health. The advertisement kills
many birds with one stone, being politically correct on at least
two counts. It is gender sensitive and it is environmentally
conscious. It would do very well coming from an NGO. But it does
not. It is issued by the Delhi Government. Why on earth should a
Government issue it? Why does it not ban the production of
polythene bags? At all times the Government distances itself from
the people. On the one occasion when it should assert its powers,
it finds it appropriate to pretend to be an NGO!
Worse is to come. As first year students of political science we
were taught that the Constitution is supreme, and that if the
legislature enacts a law that is violative of the Constitution,
the Supreme Court will declare it null and void. Now we have Mr.
Ram Jethmalani, the Law Minister, calmly declaring that if the
Supreme Court strikes down reservation of more than 50 per cent
vacancies in meeting the backlog for the Scheduled Caste and the
Scheduled Tribes in government employment, the law will be
suitably changed to bypass the Court. It is only the basic
structure we cannot touch, he assured anyone who would listen and
there were plenty of them. Here is a lawyer who has spent his
lifetime asking the Supreme Court for justice for his clients.
Yet when the cock crows he has no hesitation in saying that
Supreme Court judgments interpreting the Constitution can be
routinely flouted by amending the Constitution, unless it
involves the basic structure. Pray who is to decide what is basic
structure? What is the guarantee that those judgments will not be
set aside by our lords and masters, the politicians?
This shabby ill-treatment of courts and the Constitution has of
course occurred before (remember the Muslim Women's Bill?) of
course, but that is no reason for it to be done again. In fact
this time it is worse. It is sad that democracies are really one
party systems with every party copying the wrongs done by its
predecessors.
If this is an indication of times to come then the Constitutional
review is simply unnecessary. The Government can do what it likes
with the Constitution. No longer are we talking of Constitutional
supremacy but parliamentary hooliganism. To Mr. Jethmalani I
would like to say only one thing Et tu Brute?
Vasudha Dhagamwar,
New Delhi
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Revitalising India-East Asia ties Next : Exaggerated reports | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|