|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, May 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
A tale of two Aruns
By Inder Malhotra
In New Delhi's corridors of power these days, the most absorbing
topic of conversation is Mr. Arun Singh's unobtrusive return to
the South Block in a still undefined but clearly crucial role as
Security Adviser to the Minister for External Affairs, Mr.
Jaswant Singh. Indeed, many in the politico-bureaucratic
labyrinth are already talking of the ``importance of being Arun
Singh.'' For, while most of those in the business of politics
chase power and office relentlessly - not always with conspicuous
success - in his case the reverse seems to be true.
As is well known, he was virtually dragged out of a cushy private
sector job into political arena by his childhood friend, Rajiv
Gandhi. A first-namesake of his, Mr. Arun Nehru, had traversed
the same path even earlier. By the time Rajiv was ensconced as
Prime Minister, fortified with the largest-ever popular mandate,
the joke in the capital used to be that he was ``running the
country with the help of two Aruns, one a cousin and the other a
crony.''
However, such is the nature of power and so byzantine the
political process that the trilateral partnership broke down
astonishingly fast. Both the Aruns fell from grace. Mr. Arun
Nehru was the first to go and lost no time in making common cause
with Mr. V. P. Singh, by then the rallying point for the steadily
mounting opposition to Rajiv. In sharp contrast was Mr. Arun
Singh's quiet exit and immediate departure for a remote Himalayan
retreat.For 13 years, Mr. Arun Singh has not broken his silence
on the reasons for his resignation as Minister of State for
Defence. But enough evidence has accumulated to show that he was
appalled by what can only be called the ``Bofors cover-up.''
Tense exchanges between him and Rajiv Gandhi on the file - leaked
copiously in recent years - confirm that there were shades of
Becket on the parting of the two friends.In believing that he
would be left undisturbed in self-exile, Mr. Arun Singh was
mistaken. On becoming Prime Minister in December 1989, Mr. V. P.
Singh tried hard to persuade him to take over the Defence
portfolio, but he declined. He agreed, however, to head a
committee, artfully described as a panel on defence expenditure
but actually meant to conduct a comprehensive inquiry into the
entire defence set-up. The Arun Singh Committee's report, known
to be excellent, still bears the ``top secret'' classification
and continues to gather dust in some official pigeon-hole.
A brief foray into the Foreign Office during the Kargil war, and
Mr. Arun Singh was back in the Himalayas. This time around,
however, he is in Delhi to stay. Needless to add that tongues are
wagging and there is intense speculation. The question most often
asked is whether his presence at the policy-making level would
make a difference to the tussle that is believed to be on between
Mr. Jaswant Singh and the Principal Secretary to the Prime
Minister, Mr. Brajesh Mishra.
Such gossip may be the staple of political Delhi. But, at a more
serious level, the feeling is that the External Affairs Ministry
ought to be doing more in the sphere of national security, not
just in international security discussions, than is the case at
present. Mr. Arun Singh should be able to bring about greater
interaction between defence and diplomacy, given his rich
experience and, what is even more important, the respect he
enjoys in the armed forces.
However, the key question is whether, with or without Mr. Arun
Singh's help, the structures and procedures for decision making
on national security, such as they are, can be made more
efficient, effective, cohesive and thus conducive to integrated
and well-coordinated conduct of national security. At present,
the national security scene remains cluttered, confused and
confusing. Over 20 months after it was set up, the National
Security Council (NSC) has little to show for itself. In fact it
hardly meets. The Cabinet Committee on National Security does
meet often but only to graple with the crisis of the day.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : An outdated facility | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|