|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, May 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
India, U.S. rule out support to Eelam
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, MAY 24. India today said that it was withholding any
fresh initiative for ending the strife in Sri Lanka even as New
Delhi and Washington reiterated their rejection for an
independent Tamil State.
``Fighting is going on (in Sri Lanka). There would be scope for
discussions if there is any fresh development in the fighting,''
the Foreign Secretary, Mr. Lalit Mansingh, said. He made these
observations in the presence of the U.S. Under- Secretary of
State for Political Affairs, Mr. Thomas Pickering, today.
Mr. Mansingh separately held talks with Norway's special envoy to
Sri Lanka, Mr. Erik Solheim, as international diplomacy to end
the crisis gathered momentum today.
The Foreign Secretary and his U.S. counterpart held marathon
talks this morning within the framework of Indo-U.S. foreign
office consultations. The decision to hold a regular dialogue
between foreign office officials was stated in the ``vision
document'' signed during the visit of the U.S. President, Mr.
Bill Clinton, in March this year.
Mr. Pickering addressing the press said that as visualised during
Mr. Clinton's trip, a ministerial dialogue between the U.S.
Secretary of State, Ms. Madeleine Albright, and the External
Affairs Minister, Mr. Jaswant Singh, would be held in Warsaw in
early June. Mr. Clinton had also invited the Prime Minister, Mr.
A.B. Vajpayee, for an Indo-U.S. summit.
Mr. Pickering in this morning's talks had ``expressed the
decision not to support any Tamil Independent State,'' Mr.
Mansingh said. While endorsing this view, Mr. Pickering made four
additional points while indicating the U.S. approach to the
crisis. First, he said, the U.S. supported a ``regional
initiative'' revolving around India to end the strife. Second,
Washington also backed Norway's now ``highly-developed''
diplomatic effort in addressing the complex situation. Third, the
U.S. was not intervening directly but was ``watching the
situation in Sri Lanka carefully.'' Finally, Washington wanted to
prevent a ``humanitarian catastrophe '' at all costs.
The U.S. official expressed special concern for the plight of
civilians caught in the crossfire between the Army and the Tamil
rebels. The situation, he said, was cut out for a prominent role
by the International Committee of the Red Cross.
Mr. Mansingh, asked to comment on his discussions with Mr.
Solheim, was reticent in his views. ``Mr. Solheim briefed us
about his discussions in Sri Lanka. He is now going back to
Norway.''
Analysts here pointed out that Norway was uniquely positioned to
facilitate the resolution of the conflict. Unlike India and the
U.S., which have banned the LTTE, Norway did not have to cross
legal hurdles in establishing contacts with the Tigers. In fact,
sources pointed out that the Norwegians had established regular
contacts with the LTTE through the latter's office in London.
Responding to persistent queries, Mr. Mansingh indicated that an
Indian role in evacuating troops from Sri Lanka was not imminent.
He pointed out that Sri Lanka was yet to make a formal request.
Sources said India would help only if Colombo formally asked New
Delhi to do so and if conditions were created for a ceasefire in
the Jaffna peninsula.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Blast near Norwegian embassy | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|