|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, May 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Regularisation scheme: MLAs adopt wait and watch policy
By Ashwathi Verghese
CHENNAI, MAY 24. The withdrawal of the court case by the real
estate lobby could be a pre-requisite for the proposed meeting
with the Chief Minister to sort out problems relating to the
regularisation scheme, according to sources.
Promoters have obtained a stay from the High Court contending the
rates under the various categories for building with violations/
unauthorised was too high.
The Transport Minister and CMDA chairman, Mr. K. Ponmudi, had
recently announced in the Assembly that a meeting of aggrieved
representatives of property owners, promoters along with
Opposition leaders would be held soon. The proposed consultation
across the political spectrum would be held to thrash out the
problems relating to the scheme. The issue had drawn a flak from
Opposition members as they argued that the penalty amount was
fixed arbitrarily.
Though no dates have been announced by the State Government on
the promised meeting yet, MLAs are adopting a wait and watch
policy on the issue. Some politicians are in a predicament about
participating in the discussions as it could be seen as a pitfall
in the long-term.
However, nearly everyone has advocated reducing the rates
substantially particularly for residential buildings, as much as
25 per cent. Some quarters have even recommended reducing the
rates by half for commercial establishments as well, in spite of
the profit motive. This would finally depend on how the promoters
are able to persuade the administration to their way of thinking.
Officials, on their part, admit that the rates are rather high
but point out that it should be considered as a punishment rather
than an encouragement for violating in the future.
Though the rates have been disparaged by most sections, one
distressing factor of the scheme has been the lack of
responsibility of promoters, except the argument that rates are
high. Under the scheme, the responsibility of paying up the
penalty amount is squarely on the owner with the builder getting
away scotfree. A Bill aimed at fixing responsibility of promoters
is yet to be passed. Officials feel that only when builders are
brought to book, will there be a level - playingfield where the
consumer is respected.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : 'Expert panel, a fraud' Next : Protest against irregular water supply | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|