|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, May 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Science & Tech
| Previous
| Next
On a molecular quest for eternal youth
ROIDED IS a new word that I have learnt. As may be guessed, it is
American slang and refers to the practice of having taken steroid
drugs ("steroided"), particularly the male hormone testosterone.
Men who want to build their bodies in a short cut route take this
hormone with the hope that their muscles will grow huge, their
abdomens will become rock-hard, and overall they will look like a
He Man or Hercules. Articles in the April 24 issue of Time
magazine give an alarming picture of this unhealthy obsession and
practice of some American men and boys; and if this is so in
America, can India lag behind?
As may be guessed, this desire is stoked and fueled by commercial
interests who want to promote their products through inducements
and scientific-sounding announcements in the media. Until now,
one had to administer the hormone as pills, shots or patches. But
now comes a preparation of this steroid in a gel form,
seductively named "Androgel" (andro meaning man), which is as
easy to apply as cold cream or Vaseline. True, it is available
not OTC (over the counter) but only with a doctor's prescription,
but that is a minor inconvenience which can be suffered through.
Testosterone is a steroid molecule that is synthesized naturally
in the body, and is the hormone that is responsible for " many
things male". Its synthesis is particularly switched on in the
growing male human body at puberty, and it is responsible for the
transition of the boy into manhood. This is evidenced by spurts
in hair growth (particularly on the face, chest, underarms and
the genital area), deepening of voice, growth of lean muscle
mass, increase in bone density, reproductive capability and so
on. Its level in the body stays relatively high until the age of
30 or so, after which it tapers off to a steady value until late
in life.
Many men cling to the belief that more "testo" means more "manly"
and it is this notion that leads them to administer themselves
with this hormone. Short doses of this hormone are known to
result in increase of body build, stamina, a burst of energy, and
the ability to tolerate pain and fatigue for short periods of
time. It is for this reason that some athletes administer
themselves doses of testo. Sports officials rightly debar these
athletes from the competition for seeking unfair advantage
through the use of such anabolic (body-building) drugs. But there
are some basketball and baseball players who prime themselves
regularly with set doses of testo and attempt to build themselves
into super-sportsmen. The famous baseball player Mark McGwire
admits to using Androgel.
The levels of sex hormones in a human body are naturally kept at
regulated levels, and unduly high (or low) levels can lead to
complications and side effects. These may range from acne to
liver cancer. There is thus the real danger that "roiding" can
lead to health risks. However, there are people, particularly the
elderly, beyond the age of 55 or 60, who want to look, feel and
act younger. Since the hormone levels have reduced in their
bodies, some of them look for "natural" and acceptable ways of
increasing them, and thus attempt to "reverse ageing", as it
were. What they would like best is a natural and acceptable way
of increasing the levels of hormones in the body when necessary.
After all, for post-menopausal women, where osteoporosis or bone
thinning and weakening is a major risk, doctors have been
suggesting the so- called hormone replacement therapy (or HRT),
which seems to be by and large accepted by many women. Are there
special foods, "organic preparations", lotions or potions, herbs
or plant extracts, or other naturally occurring substances that
can be taken which would keep one younger and stronger longer?
This of course is the billion-dollar question that is being
addressed by a variety of groups. Leading the pack are the
"health food" people, a new tribe of commercial interest that is
raking in profits by promoting and selling a spectrum of herb and
plant extracts, oriental and native American traditional health
products, as well as metabolic intermediates. Some of these are
well known and accepted to be beneficial, while others need to be
validated and verified. Companies such as General Nutrition
Center (GNC) have their shops in every major shopping mall across
America, selling not only traditional health aids such as
ginseng, sarsaparilla, herbal tea and the like but also synthetic
formulations based on what has been understood (or thought to be
useful) from biochemical pathways in the body. Thus it is that
vitamin E, folic acid and antioxidants share the shelf with St.
Johns Wort (taken to counter depression and anxiety) and Ginkgo
Biloba (neuroprotector and blood flow enhancer). All these
formulations are sold as health aids and are thus not required to
be cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the US
government, as drugs are required to.
The latest to join this list of health promoting substances are
two biochemical intermediates, the steroid molecules with the
complicated names of Dehydroepiandrosterone or DHEA and its
sulfate form DHEAS. DHEA also goes by the name of prasterone.
Both DHEA and DHEAS have been dubbed as "mother hormones" and are
sold with great fanfare as "fountain of youth" and "miracle
pill", with scientific sounding assertions such as "antidote for
ageing", "life extension molecules" and so on. Verily the modern
equivalent of what traditional Indian medicine called as "kaya
kalpa".
Biochemists have known for some time that prasterone is the major
steroid molecule in the blood of humans. It is produced in the
adrenal glands of both men and women, and is the parent molecule
out of which many other steroids,including the "male hormone"
testosterone and the "woman hormone" estradiol, are derived, in
an age-dependent and sex- dependent manner. DHEAS itself is
produced in the body from cholesterol through enzyme- catalyzed
reactions, and exists both as the sulfate and in a form in which
the sulfate is lost, namely as DHEA or prasterone. The level of
DHEAS increases in the body, particularly at puberty and reaches
a maximum around 15- 19 years in women and 20- 24 years in men,
after which there is a steady decline with age. Generally males
have 40per cent more DHEA and DHEAS in their bodies than women of
the same age do. It is out of DHEA(S) that testosterone is made
in the human body and this, in turn, produces the truly male
hormones androsterone and its cousin that we shall simply call as
ADG, as well as the female hormones such as estradiol. The
relative levels of testo and ADG to that of estradiol vary
distinctly between men and women; in men the ratio is tilted
largely towards the former two steroids while in females the
opposite is true.
Since both the male and female steroid hormones are made from the
common starting material DHEA(S), an idea that has been (rightly
or wrongly) gaining ground is that it is safer and more
acceptable to take DHEA as a health supplement and rejuvenator.
This idea needs validation. The usual practice of controlled
laboratory animal experiments will not work here, since the
levels of DHEA(S) in animals, young or ageing, have not been
described. In any event, the number of elderly men and women who
are already taking DHEA, with the hope of reducing and even
curing age- related diseases and debility, is already large and
growing with time. Prasterone is thus thought to be not as much a
drug against a given disease or dysfunction, but more as a tonic
that helps improve the overall quality of life, help keep young,
and as an antidote for ageing. A rigorous, controlled clinical
trial involving human volunteers would be essential in order to
test the efficacy of DHEA treatment, its safety and side effects,
and related issues of socio-bio-medical nature.
It is with these in mind that a year-long study was conducted by
Dr. Etienne-Emile Baulieu and colleagues in Paris, France. They
selected 280 volunteers between the ages of 60 and 79, of which
there were 70 men and 70 women in the 60-69 years of age bracket
and an equal number of men and women in the 70-79 years bracket.
These were chosen on the basis of prior health check-up which
revealed them to be healthy of body and mind, with no symptoms
related to ageing such as asthenia, memory complaints, hormone-
dependent cancer or other conditions, dementia, pain, anxiety or
other major depressive state. The study was conducted in a
randomized, double blind fashion in which neither the doctors nor
the volunteers knew who was given what treatment, so that no
intrinsic bias creeps in. Half the volunteers were given a daily
dose of two 25- milligram tablets of prasterone (DHEA), while the
other half was given identical looking dummy tablets with no drug
in it (called placebo in medical jargon). Each of them was
monitored regularly for their psychological state, quality of
life, sexual functions and libido, muscular strength, skin tone
and texture, and also biochemically for the levels of DHEAS,
testosterone, ADG and estradiol. The bone strength and its
mineral density were tested using X- ray methods and the blood
vessels by ultrasound. The results of the study, termed "The
DHEAge Study", have just been published in the April 11 issue of
PNAS, USA, and will also be available in the website
www.dheage.com, which is under construction.
The Baulieu study recorded no potentially harmful accumulation of
DHEAS or active steroids. In men, DHEA treatment led to an
increase in testosterone and ADG levels, approaching those seen
in young adult men. In women, the picture was slightly different
in terms of the time taken, but even here the levels of DHEAS and
ADG levels were raised to those seen in young women. Happily, no
changes were seen in the levels of other hormones such as
luteinizing hormone, thyroid hormones and so on. The skin tone
improved, with less dryness and better hydration as well as
oiliness. The skin colour improved somewhat, to a level that
might be thought of as a trend towards rejuvenation. The bone
mineralization parameters improved. With women, libido increased.
The effect of DHEA on vasculature, namely blood vessels, was not
significant, so that its use in hypertension or stroke is not
clear. Overall, a number of biological indicators suggest that no
harm arises from the daily dose of about 50 mg of DHEA for a
year, and that this kind of replacement therapy reversed some
effects associated with ageing, though it does not create
"supermen" or "superwomen".
Just a month ahead of the Baulieu paper came a report in the
journal Lipids from Dr. J. R. Williams of Temple University in
Philadelphia, where he analyzed the effects of DHEA on cancer,
obesity, the immune system and ageing. DHEA appears beneficial in
these situations too, and the mechanisms seem to be multiple in
nature. Some of these mechanisms have been highlighted and
discussed by Williams, who also points out that some molecules
that are related to DHEA, which are being tested for their
effects on these mechanisms might offer themselves as candidates
for clinically useful drugs based on the properties of DHEA. (For
people who prefer natural foods for their nutrition and health,
it needs to be said that as of today, there are no plant or other
naturally occurring sources of DHEA; the wild yam contains a
precursor molecule, but eating this does not lead to the
production of DHEA in the human body, so that, as of now, we
depend on the synthetic chemist).
Does this mean that we have found the miracle anti-ageing pill?
Can we all start popping in DHEA and feel the flush of youth?
Though the French study found largely beneficial trends and no
side effects in these 280 volunteers, there are records of some
side effects of DHEA. A whole website dedicated to DHEA, called
http://dheanet, and another, more gushy one called
www.naples.net., talk minimally about these. The GNC website,
however, reports that DHEA can produce irritation, increased
acne, facial hair, perspiration,oily skin, headache and sometimes
more severe reactions in individuals. As in most other matters,
do not rush to the nearest health food store for DHEA before you
consult with your doctor!
D. Balasubramanian
L.V.Prasad Eye Institute
Hyderabad 500 034
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Science & Tech Previous : Question Corner Next : Changing face of microelectronics | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|