|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, May 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
TV station attacked in Fiji capital
By P. S. Suryanarayana
SINGAPORE, MAY 28. A new wave of political unrest swept across
the Fijian capital of Suva tonight, hours after the ``coup''
leader, Mr. George Speight, had maintained that he could not be
blamed for (the previous) law and order problems in the city as
``the Army is deployed all around us'' (the ``coup'' leadership).
The sounds of gunfire were heard late in the night in the
vicinity of the residence of the President, Ratu Kamisese Mara,
and a television network was disabled, according to foreign
diplomats and observers in Suva. There was no conclusive
information about who was responsible and what might have been
the immediate provocation for the firing near the President's
mansion, but the incident occurred in the overall context of what
was seen as a new campaign of intimidation by the Speight
brigade.
Groups of Mr. Speight's supporters had earlier in the night moved
out of the parliament complex, where he was holding in captivity
the democratically elected Prime Minister, Mr. Mahendra Chaudhry,
for the tenth consecutive day, and invaded the local television
station. Sources said a blackout which occurred at the television
facility seemed to have been the handiwork of Mr. Speight's
supporters. The television complex itself was said to have been
badly damaged. The free movement of the armed supporters of Mr.
Speight was made possible by the ``withdrawal'' of the Army from
the vicinity of their ``base'' - the parliament building -
following the President's announcement yesterday stripping Mr.
Chaudhry of the post of Prime Minister. Although Parliament
itself was not dissolved in conjunction with the dismissal of the
elected Prime Minister, it remained suspended.
Today's violence cast a deep shadow over the efforts of the
President to solve the crisis on the basis of the continuing
parleys between a sub-committee of the Great Council of Chiefs
and Mr. Speight's designated interlocutors. The talks were
largely aimed at finding a solution based on the norm that top
executive positions and real political power should be vested in
the majority indigenous population even if that be at the expense
of the rights of the substantive minority of ethnic Indians. This
formula was said to be a native-Fijian backlash to the suspected
efforts of Mr. Chaudhry at perpetuating and expanding the
dominance of the ethnic Indians at the cost of the interests of
the indigenous population.
However, even in the midst of the dialogue between the
representatives of the indigenous chiefs and Mr. Speight's team,
the ``coup'' leader remained unrelenting in his demand that Mr.
Mara first quit as President. Mr. Mara's action of dissolving the
duly elected government headed by Mr. Chaudhry, widely condemned
by the international community as a capitulation to those seeking
to ``usurp'' power, did not go far enough in pleasing Mr.
Speight. The charge of ``usurpation'' of power was countered by
Mr. Speight on the ground that at least the now-deposed Prime
Minister and others of his line of thinking were seeking to
subject Fiji to an ``Indian colonisation''.
Mr. Speight dismissed Mr. Mara's move against Mr. Chaudhry as
``an act of a desperate man'' and asserted that he was ``not too
concerned'' about either the threatened sporting boycott of Fiji
by other countries or the ``$ 22 millions worth of aid (to Suva)
from Australia'' which might be in jeopardy now. Australia, while
criticising Mr. Mara's attempted appeasement of Mr. Speight,
ruled out either a East Timor-style military intervention or a
show of ``gunboat diplomacy'' in regard to Fiji
AP reports: Mr. Speight, who received a delegation from the Great
Council of Chiefs, said he expected a new offer within two days
that could lead to the freeing of the hostages. Any deal would
have to be ratified by the full Council, he said.
Several countries have threatened to impose economic and
diplomatic sanctions on Fiji. The Fiji Hoteliers' Associated
president, Mr. Hafiz Khan, said cancellations had skyrocketed
since the crisis began.
IPU chief warns Fiji
In the Egyptian capital of Cairo, the president of the Inter-
Parliamentary Union (IPU), Ms. Najma Heptullah, threatened to
expel Fiji from the Union if the democratic process was not
restored in the country by October.
``If by October, when the IPU meets in Jakarta for its meeting,
the situation does not change in Fiji, then the IPU could kick
out the country from the grouping,'' she said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Only the odd apple is rotten: Gavaskar | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Southern States |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Other States |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|