|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, June 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
India cut off talks: Sattar
By Sridhar Krishnaswami
WASHINGTON, JUNE 16. Pakistan wishes that India would follow up
on the Lahore process, which among other things, had called for
an intensification of efforts to resolve all outstanding issues,
including Kashmir, says the country's Foreign Minister, Mr. Abdul
Sattar.
At the National Press Club, Mr. Sattar termed the Lahore meeting
of February 1999 as a good one that was forward looking for both
India and Pakistan but it was India that decided to cut off that
dialogue with Pakistan. ``It is India's choice, not ours and we
can live with the situation. We will wait for India to consider
whether stalling the dialogue will serve their interests
better,'' Mr.Sattar remarked.
On the issue of trust that had gone away in the aftermath of
Kargil, Mr. Sattar said the history of the region showed that
there was no trust between India and Pakistan; as New Delhi had
always sought to leverage the power disparity in South Asia for
imposing its own preferences - something that Islamabad could
never accept.
Mr. Sattar was often interrupted by people of Afghan origin and
their supporters protesting Islamabad's policy of backing the
Taliban in their country. A handful of demonstrators were outside
the National Press Club Building as well, denouncing Pakistan's
Afghan policy. Mr. Sattar disputed the notion that the Taliban
was being led around by Pakistan stressing that the Afghans were
too fiercely independent to allow this.
To a question on the Pakistani response to the National Missile
Defence system that is currently being proposed by the United
States in the context of the perceived responses of India and
China, Mr. Sattar insisted that Pakistan's desire was to
stabilise the overt nuclearisation of South Asia and that the
country was not for a nuclear arms race.
Mr. Sattar then talked about a ``plan'' that India appeared to
have for an Anti Ballistic Missile capability which, in his view,
would destabilise the deterrence in South Asia. If the present
situation in the sub-continent destabilised, Pakistan would be
obliged to upgrade its defensive deterrent capability, he said.
He also played down a report in sections of the media here that
Pakistan's nuclear capability was vastly superior to that of
India, quality and quantity-wise. Pakistan's programme and
capability were very limited in contrast to India's and Islamabad
was not competing with India.
Mr. Sattar also referred to Kashmir being the ``core issue'' and
made the point that Islamabad was ready for any kind of a
peaceful settlement for the resolution of this problem. Noting
that there were different means to sort out contentious issues,
Mr. Sattar said that Pakistan was prepared for any method of
settling disputes - negotiations, good offices, mediation and
adjudication - including that for Kashmir.
Mr. Sattar said that he shared the American concern on terrorism
as Pakistan itself had been the target of terrorism. Maintaining
that Islamabad did not share Washington's perception that the
centre of gravity of terrorism had shifted to South Asia, Mr.
Sattar noted that Pakistan's influence with the Taliban in
Afghanistan was very limited and sanctions against that
fundamentalist outfit would only make matters worse.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : PM to meet RSS chief, explain compulsions Next : Players under a cloud must quit: Dhindsa | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|