|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, June 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Opening new vistas to coaching
THE FRONTIERS of knowledge in sport, or for that matter, in any
walk of life, are infinite. There is a constant endeavour to
create, conceive and configure innovations that improve, or even
replace, what are in vogue. In sport it is the coaches who
conceptualise ideas that project modes and methods to challenge
each other. Modern sport will be mundane and meaningless, may
even be irrelevant, if human ingenuity is not stretched to
scripting fresh formulations aimed at giving the game a new
aspect of excellence.
Competitive hockey is no exception. The progress made with regard
to purveying a new vista to coaching and planning is indeed
remarkable. If Europe has taken the dominating role in the last
decade of this millennium with no sign of diminishing in the next
generation, it is largely on account of the new insights
established in coaching, technique, tactics and theory.
Poignantly perhaps, Asia, the sub-continent in particular, is
forced to learn a few from this to change the conventional system
and adopt means that should mirror a more vibrant ethos. The
resistance to modern concepts does exist, with a few arguing what
has been done is only to blunt the Asian system rather than
creating something extraordinary. Beyond a point, this advocacy
cannot stand a logical scrutiny, if the goal is success in
competitions.
It is perhaps with this end in view that the Indian Hockey
Federation is making use of the courses organised by the
International Hockey Federation. Conducted usually by expert
coaches, who have proven credentials in competitions like the
Olympics and World Cups, such courses do help to reorient the
styles and system. How much the coaches who attended these
sessions imbibe and change their approach may be debatable but
everyone agrees they do benefit in widening their horizon.
Among the few who sincerely believe that a lot has to be gained
from such courses is the national junior coach, C. R. Kumar, who
attended the recent programme conducted along with the Champions
Trophy in Amstelveen. There is a consensus in hockey circles that
Kumar is gaining in stature for his tactical workouts, perception
and interpretation, especially after his splendid role in shaping
the junior squad which earned encomiums for its performance in
the Asia Cup tournament at Kuala Lumpur last month. That India
failed to win the final caused a surprise even to the supporters
of the eventual winner, South Korea.
Kumar concedes the week-long course held by the Australian
maestro, Richard Aggiss and the Dutch theoretician Boudewijn,
provided an indepth study of every facet of hockey. He is
impressed by the chance of interacting with so many national
coaches - there were representations from Holland, U.K., Canada,
Jamaica, including three women - and the discussions were
extremely fruitful. Kumar's chosen area of study was ``reverse
hit'' and the observations submitted, according to him, were very
well received. Quite predictably, Kumar used the occasion to
witness the top six men's team in the Champions Trophy to chart
his programme to be implemented at Bangalore where the Olympic
probables are under training now. Kumar is the assistant coach to
Baskaran. In his evaluation, Holland is a perfectly balanced
squad, almost flawless in approach, notwithstanding the absence
of Bram Lomans, recovering from a surgery, and Jacques Brinkmann,
injured during the tournament. But, Kumar feels, the Dutch played
a better pace without the aging Brinkmann in the midfield and is
amazed by the innovations put into use by the Dutch coach,
Maurits Hendriks.
Kumar is somewhat puzzled by the acceptance of the 3-3-1
formation by all the combinations, including the Aussies, who
deviated from the 4-4-2 system which had paid them good dividends
earlier. His assessment is that the teams had not laid out all
the cards on the table, palpably because of the Olympics in a few
months. The defence, Kumar feels, in all the teams carried a
chink in the armour, which probably accounted for 75 per cent of
the goals coming from field play with penalty corners succeeding
only up to 18 per cent. While paying tributes to the known
strength of physical fitness of all the six teams, Kumar says the
perfection in technique for the European teams emerges from the
hi-tech. video equipment where the technicians clip and paste
various sequences which can be easily explained to the player
concerned and not make the whole team watch the entire tape. As
for players, Kumar is tremendously impressed by Pablo Amat of
Spain, whose body dodges, he says, will put any Asian top player
in the shade, and also by the skills of the 19-year-old Spaniard,
Eudward Tubau. Kumar is also intrigued by the formation and
positions played by Micehal Green and Florian Kunz and wonders
what is the game plan of the inscrutable German coach, Paul
Lissek. He attributes Britain's disastrous show to the excessive
dependence on Calum Giles in penalty corners. British coach Barry
Dancer's emphasis in this area was at variance with the others.
Kumar is of the view that top coaches still view India as a
danger outfit. They discuss a great deal about containing the
forwards Dhanraj Pillay, Baljit Singh Dhillon and Mukesh Kumar.
Although most of the coaches say they are familiar with the style
and tactics of these, they fear that India might come out with a
variation at the Olympics. Kumar stresses the fact that the
attack involving Mukesh, Dhanraj and Dillon, should contain more
surprise element to upset the rival defence. A prosaic approach
as is evident now will easily be countered by the defence.
Understandably, Kumar is sad that India failed to win at Kuala
Lumpur. He is happy that the country today has the best of talent
in shape for the future. His faith is in Bimal Lakra and Bipin
Fernandez whom, he feels are Olympic material.
Is Kumar shaping like Cedric D'Souza? It may be an irrelevant
poser at this point. But there is every reason to feel that here
is a coach who is not averse to theorising a bit, think a lot and
conceive systems that are refreshing and, in his estimate, can be
rewarding. What he has acquired in terms of knowledge during the
week-long course is bound to enhance his comprehension and find a
cure to the growing complexities to modern hockey and its
adaptation to this country.
S. THYAGARAJAN
Chennai
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Woods sparkles in the fog with a stroll on the Beach Next : Joe The Pro silences critics | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|