|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, June 19, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
Solanki supporters want Patel removed
By Manas Dasgupta
AHMEDABAD, JUNE 18. A possible showdown between the two factions
of the Gujarat Pradesh Congress(I) has been avoided for now,
following the intervention of the party high command.
The members of the factions have cited the death of the senior
party leader and working committee member, Rajesh Pilot, as the
reason for postponing their meetings but in reality it is to give
more time to the high command to sort out the differences.
While the faction led by the veteran party leader and the former
AICC(I) general secretary, Mr. Madhavsinh Solanki, was due to
meet in Gandhinagar tomorrow, the group supporting the Pradesh
Congress(I) president, Mr. C.D. Patel, had planned a get-
together a few kilometres away at Prantij in the neighbouring
Sabarkantha district.
The Patel faction, which also includes the leader of the
Opposition in the State Assembly, Mr. Amarsinh Chaudhary,
however, denied that it was a parallel meeting and maintained
that the Prantij get-together was only to censure the BJP
Government in the State for its alleged failure to handle the
prevailing drought.
Apparently, it was aimed at demonstrating its strength in view of
the meeting convened earlier by the Solanki faction to discuss
its future course of action to press their demand for a change in
the State leadership.
The Prantij meeting was seemingly aimed at thwarting the high
command's reported decision to replace Mr. C. D. Patel with a
Kshatriya leader ahead of the organisational elections scheduled
later this year. But at the instance of the AICC(I) Secretary in-
charge of Gujarat Affairs, Ms. Prabha Rao, the meeting has been
postponed indefinitely. The Solanki faction has rescheduled its
meeting for June 24 after the former External Affairs Minister
returned from his visit to Bihar as a member of the high command
team to review the party's support to the Rabri Devi Ministry.
The relations between Mr. Solanki and the C. D. Patel- Chaudhary
faction had never been cordial but it reached a new low as Mr.
Solanki was denied a third term in the Rajya Sabha in April at
the instance of Mr. Chaudhary and his supporters. A majority of
the party MLAs had threatened to vote against the official
nominee, if Mr. Solanki was re-nominated at the expiry of his
second term in the Upper House.
The Solanki supporters, who by and large were lying low when
their leader was away in Delhi for more than decade, started
regrouping ever since he returned to his private house in
Gandhinagar in April. The continuous decline of the Congress(I)
in the State in the last few elections under Mr. Patel's
leadership has helped the Solanki faction to press their demand
for a change, particularly to replace the present incumbent with
a Kshatriya leader. The faction is of the view that the
Congress(I) prospects could best be served by a Kshatriya leader,
since both the upper caste ``Patels'' and the socially and
educationally backward classes, to which Mr. C.D. Patel belonged,
had traditionally sided with the BJP.
Meanwhile, the factional fight in the ruling BJP has also
heightened with the withdrawal of the resignation by the Minister
of State for Home, Mr. Haren Pandya, and the Deputy Labour and
Employment Minister, Mr. Purshottam Solanki, describing the
entire episode as a ``political drama''.
The Deputy Minister, in the eye of a storm in the recent ``cable
war'' episode that led to Mr. Pandya's resignation, returned to
his Ministerial office with the release on bail of his brother,
Mr. Bharat Solanki. He did not take kindly to Mr. Pandya's
resignation and his subsequent withdrawal stating that Mr. Pandya
had embarrassed the Chief Minister, Mr. Keshubhai Patel.
He said he too was with Mr. Pandya to fight against
criminalisation of politics but failed to understand who Mr.
Pandya termed as the ``anti-social elements'' polluting the
political atmosphere.
``Certainly my 81 innocent Koli supporters falsely implicated for
attempted murder cases cannot be described as anti-social
elements,'' he said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Assam Govt. seeks Rs. 500 cr. Central loan Next : Haryana Govt. flayed for exam. postponement | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|