|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, June 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Next
Learning from Audrey
TWICE during the last week, I watched a well-made documentary on
the great Hollywood actress, Audrey Hepburn, who died of cancer
some years ago. Now, Ms Hepburn was not a beauty queen by any
means, yet turned out to be one of the greatest actresses from
Hollywood. With only a little stage experience, she graduated to
a number of plum roles and was the delight of her directors and
co-stars.
To me, her role of a princess in the film "Roman Holiday" was
quite unforgettable. It was her first major film. Yet her
approach to acting was so refreshing and her performance so
convincing that her co-star Gregory Peck, a senior actor, allowed
her top billing. Audrey went on to win the best actress Oscar for
the movie.
This film was followed by a number of others, each different from
the other. Audrey starred in "Sabrina", "War and Peace", "Funny
Face", "The Nun's Story", "Breakfast at Tiffany's" (picture) and
"Wait until Dark". She worked with the topmost talent in
Hollywood and every single director and hero enjoyed the
experience of working with her. Like all great stars, Audrey was
selective about her roles and spurned those which tended to
glamourise her.
In the midst of her brilliant career, Audrey branched out to
different avenues. She was chosen an ambassador by the United
Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. For her, it was
not an ornamental post. For nearly ten years, she was an active
representative, travelling around the world, studying the
problems of undernourished children in the developing nations.
The Audrey Hepburn documentary was a heartwarming experience. We
saw the famous star holding children who were nothing but skin
and bones and trying to comfort them. She was at various refugee
camps where people from war-torn nations huddled together. The
children here had a haunted look. Some of them were badly
wounded, there was no hope in their dull eyes. Audrey held them
close, fed them, tried to comfort them and it was clear the
children responded to her. They clung to her in desperation, she
seemed to have so much warmth and kindness to give to them.
All this work was carried out despite serious family and health
problems. Audrey Hepburn married three times, suffered
miscarriages and by the time she was 55, she was seriously ill.
But her work with the children went on as though nothing had
happened. She still radiated the same feelings. It was like
watching Mother Teresa in action.
Mother Teresa lived to a ripe old age, but Audrey Hepburn was not
so lucky. Watching the documentary, I marvelled at her ability to
switch roles effortlessly, from a successful actress to a UNICEF
ambassador and shower affection on children from the Third World.
All this was done without any fanfare or media publicity.
Audrey Hepburn was an actress turned do-gooder. She excelled in
both roles. I wonder why some of our aspiring actresses are not
inspired by her example. I am particularly referring to our crop
of beauty queens who parrot their ambitions to be a Mother
Teresa, take care of the orphan children the world over and
change the world into a better one. These answers are obviously
drilled into them and it is quite clear they lack sincerity. Once
the crown is on their heads, our beauty queens forget all about
being Mother Teresa and so on. They become members of the
celebrity crowd, but their ultimate ambition is to land up in
Bollywood and become stars. Look at Sushmita Sen, Aishwariya Rai
and others. The not-so-successful ones become veejays, compres at
beauty contests and remain on the fringes of show business. But
no one buzzes off to take care of orphans! Remind them about
their commitment to Mother Teresa, taking care of orphans and
tackling the problems of the world and the subject is quickly
changed. Well, some of them do enact such roles in their films,
that is all.
There is nothing wrong in aspiring to be a film star.
Entertaining people is a noble profession. But why should
beautiful women who really aspire to be film stars come out with
fanciful ideas of being social workers and changing the course of
the world. Why indulge in such hypocrisy? Rather than Mother
Teresa, our beauty contest winners should quote the example of
Audrey Hepburn. They should aspire to tackle the kind of
challenging roles she did, and help the children, elderly or the
sick people of the world. Unfortunately, this attitude is totally
lacking among our stars.
V. GANGADHAR
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Next : Rocking fans with fusion music | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|