|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, July 05, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Changing pattern of GDP growth
By V. S. Sambandan
Behing the statistics on the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for
1999-2000 released by the Central Statistical Organisation (CSO)
last week lies the story of India's ongoing transformation from
an agriculture driven economy to one in which the share of the
services sector is increasing by the passing decade.
Gaining from a share of 31.9 per cent to the GDP in 1970-71 to
47.1 per cent by 1999-2000, the services sector has come to take
the place of agriculture as the largest contributor.
The spurt in the contribution of the services sector to the GDP
has been especially marked since 1990-91. The services sector
comprises three sub-sectors (based on the classification adopted
by the Economic Survey) - trade, hotels, transport and
communications; financial services and community, social and
personal services. If one were to bring `construction' activity
(classified by the Survey under the secondary sector) under the
tertiary sector, as some other classifications do, the share of
services would increase a further five percentage points, taking
their contribution past the 50 per cent mark. In 1999-2000, the
combined contribution of the tertiary sector (47.1) and the
`construction' segment (5.17) the second-largest contributor to
the manufacturing sector, would amount to 52.27 per cent.
India's transition from agriculture to services as the main
contributor to the GDP is also to be seen with the increasing
share of the trade, hotels, transport and communications segment
in the services sector - from 14 per cent to 21 per cent between
1970-71 and 1999-2000. The rise has been especially sharp in the
Nineties when the segment raised its contribution from 17.8 per
cent in 1990-91 to 21.37 per cent last year.
The inter-decadal growth of the services sector's share of the
GDP has been marked by a simultaneous fall in the primary
sector's contribution (agriculture , forestry and fishing) and a
smaller rise in contribution from the secondary sector (mining
and quarrying, manufacturing, electricity, gas and water supply
and construction).
If the three broad categories - primary, secondary and tertiary -
were to be seen with their sub-classifications, Agriculture and
allied sectors, constituting the primary sector, contributed
25.52 per cent of the GDP in 1999-2000. Under the secondary
(industry) sector, manufacturing was the single-largest
contributor (17.49) followed by construction (5.17), electricity,
gas and water supply (2.52) and mining and quarrying (2.20). In
the tertiary (services) sector, the trade, hotels, transport and
communication segment made up for 21.37 per cent, followed by
community, social and personal services (13.18) and financing,
insurance, real estate and business services (12.55).
Contribution of services - real or exaggerated
Shifting sectoral contributions gain significance as high-growth
economies are those which have services as the main contributor
to the GDP. Given this global setting, the rising share of
services is to be viewed against past experience of the developed
economies where the tertiary sector gained a pronounced share in
GDP only after gains had been made first from the primary to the
secondary sector. In India, on the other hand, there has been a
direct switch from the agriculture sector to the services sector
as the dominant contributor to the national product. This
leapfrogging in sectoral contributions, bypassing the stage of
increased industrial contribution, has led to divergent views on
whether the rising share of services reflects any real
development or not.
Pointing out that the sectoral contribution in India is "in line
with the general trend of the world," Dr. Raja J. Chelliah,
Chairman of the Madras School of Economics, says, "As the economy
develops, generally the per capita income increases and there is
greater specialisation" which "tends to push up the share of the
services."
While higher per capita incomes result in increased spending on
services, greater specialisation in the productive sectors
results in contracting out services which were originally
performed within the manufacturing sector.
Yet another reason is the "emergence of the financial sector as a
rapidly growing sector in the world economy," he said, contending
that it could be concluded that "the growth of the share of the
services sector in the Indian economy reflects real development."
The bypassing of the industrial stage, however, is not taken
lightly by all economists. In fact, some see the Indian
experience as one that is not reflective of any positive economic
transformation.
Arguing that unlike in India, the increasing contribution of
services to the GDP of the developed countries was preceded by
growing primary and secondary sectors, Dr. K. Nagaraj, Professor,
Madras Institute of Development Studies, contends that the rising
share of the services sector should also be seen in the context
of the dichotomies within the economy as well as within the
services sector. Especially significant is the rapidly growing
informal sector and particularly alarming is its expansion to the
rural economy.
Rather than arising from the growth of the primary (agriculture)
and secondary (industry) sectors, the growth in the Indian
services sector is seen as one which has been on account of
rising government expenditure, Dr. Nagaraj said, adding that
"phenomenal increase" in government spending, for instance, is
cause for concern.
According to Dr. Chelliah, increases in both government
employment and increases in the "real incomes of government
servants may not be reflecting any increase in the contribution
of the government sector to the economy."
Moreover, there is "clearly an exaggeration of the contribution
of the services by the government sector".
The growing contribution of services to the GDP is also marked
since the Eighties, coinciding, as Dr. Nagaraj points out, with
the slowdown in reduction of rural poverty levels. Yet another
factor which gives no cause for cheer is the increasing
informalisation of the rural sector - signifying the saturation
of urban absorption capacities.
The slowdown in rural poverty levels throws up an alarming signal
on development.
Given the increasingly skewed contributions by the three sectors
to the GDP, correctives will have to be considered. Above all,
computation problems persist.
While conceding that there is reason to think that the CSO is not
correctly measuring the relative contribution of the services
sector, Dr. Chelliah said the increase its share as revealed by
the CSO figures did reflect a real underlying trend.
Facing as it does a change from the past global experience of
moving from the agricultural and industrial stages of
development, India's leapfrogging into the services sector throws
up several crucial issues.
The primary one to be addressed by economists and policy makers
as India proceeds with its liberalisation policy relates to
assessing the quantum of real and exaggerated contribution of the
services sector to the overall development of the economy.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : IBMs Netfinity servers Next : Website for CFOs | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|