|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, July 17, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Oppn. misinterpreting court order: CM
By Our Special Correspondent
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, JULY 16. The Chief Minister, Mr. E. K.
Nayanar, has accused the Opposition and the BJP of twisting the
observations in the High Court order on the Plus Two issue for
their ulterior political motives.In a statement here today, he
said these parties, aided by a section of the media, were
continuing their misinformation campaign by misinterpreting the
court order.
Quoting extensively from the order, Mr. Nayanar said that what
the court had done was to criticise the Government for not
adhering to the guidelines set by the executive itself for
selecting schools for the Plus Two courses while preparing this
year's list. Due to this very reason, the court ordered the
cancellation of this year's list of 360 schools selected from
among 1,429 schools.
The Court order said: ``...it must be borne in mind that under
the five government orders/notifications, the district-wise
committees have been constituted and we have referred earlier to
the elaborate procedure the district-wise committee has to
follow. This procedure has been further reiterated and a further
expert committee was contemplated.
``The exercise of the power of the Government in the past three
academic years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000 prima facie,
appears to be in accordance with the said procedure laid down in
these five orders/notifications. The orders granting permission
in the past refer to the procedure being followed. Surprisingly,
in the two impugned orders, there is not even a whisper of any
such procedure being followed.
``The Government is exercising a purely executive power. We are
told that there is no legislation or rules yet framed in the
matter of grant of Plus Two courses. We proceed on the footing
that the grant of Plus Two course is purely in the realm of
executive powers. The question is whether, while exercising that
power, the Government has adhered to the established procedure.
The object of the procedure is to ensure minimum standard in the
academic institutions. If a procedure laid down by the executive
has not been followed by the executive itself, there is no
hesitation in our mind that it would suffer from the vice of
arbitrariness and mala fides. It would, therefore, violate the
mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution''.
Mr. Nayanar said that what the court had really done was to point
out the `inappropriateness' of the executive flouting the
guidelines of its own creation.
The court, in its order, had further clarified that ``We have not
stated anything about political mala fides. We have not
considered the mala fides alleged by the petitioners. We have
only dealt with procedure lapse in sanctioning the Plus Two
course. We are not dealing with the contentions of extraneous
considerations raised by the petitioners''.
Mr. Nayanar said the Government was fully submitting itself to
the court direction to set right the lapses and ensure that a
fresh list was published But the designs of the Opposition and
the BJP were something else.
Sensing that the Plus Two issue is not gaining currency among the
public at large, Mr. A. K. Antony and his associates have
demanded that pre-degree should not be delinked from the
colleges. In the 57th paragraph of the order on Plus Two case,
the court stated as follows:
``In the present case, we are concerned with improving the
standards of education. This has to be in tune with the National
Education Policy. Abolition of Pre-degree course was with a view
to improving the standard of education. Preamble of the said
Abolition Act says so. Plus Two course is meant to be a
substitute to the erstwhile Pre Degree course.... We have no
doubt in our mind that when the first respondent State framed the
guidelines, laid down the procedure in the five Government orders
of 1997 and 1998, it had this concern for the good of the student
community, of society and the nation at large''.
He said the Advocate General had been asked to study the 78-page
order of the High Court's Division Bench in detail and submit his
recommendations on what further legal measures should be taken by
the Government on the case.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Man waylaid, robbed of cash, chain Next : VS blames Joseph | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|