|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, July 27, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Conundrums of disinvestment
THE DISINVESTMENT programme of the Union Finance Ministry had to
encounter many hurdles in its implementation with the Opposition
parties being averse even to a limited dilution of Government
ownership in public sector enterprises (PSEs). Because of the
difficulty in arriving at a consensus and taking firm decisions,
the disinvestment of portions of Government holdings in PSEs
could not be attempted advantageously. The targets for securing
resources could not be reached in many financial years. Besides,
the incorrect timing of sales and the adoption of different
procedures for disinvestment of specified blocks of shares were
responsible in earlier years for the realisation of prices, which
were lower than visualised. Full advantage was not taken of the
buoyancy in stock markets at particular stages.
Ingenious strategy in 1998-99
The resources secured since the disinvestment process started in
1991 amounted to Rs.19,209 crores upto March 31, 2000. Only in
three years, 1991-92, 1994-95 and 1998-99 were the were exceeded.
This was due to the fact that the package offers in 1991 were
highly advantageous from the point of view of institutional
investors. In 1994-95 the stock markets were buoyant and auctions
could be successfully conducted at intervals. However, in 1998-99
an ingenious approach was adopted with the Government offloading
specified blocks of shares by taking advantage of the cash rich
position of companies in the petroleum sector. In these three
years, the total amount secured was Rs. 13,252 crores or 69 per
cent of the total proceeds.
The budget estimate of Rs. 5,000 crores under this head in 1998-
99 was surpassed with the total at Rs. 5,371. The Centre divested
9.11 per cent of its holdings in Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) to
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) while IOC itself took up
from the Centre 10 per cent of the capital of ONGC and a similar
percentage in Gas Authority of India (GAIL). The last mentioned
for its part absorbed 2.5 per cent of equity capital of ONGC.
In 1999-2000, the required resources could have been easily
mobilised from the open market as the bourses were extremely
active until March this year. The BSE index touched a new peak of
6150.69 on February 14. But the Union Finance Ministry could not
take definite decisions as the unloading of blocks of equities in
GAIL through an issue of GDRs having an equivalent price of Rs.
70 per share in November 1999 was at a price lower than on the
previous occasion. This came in for severe criticism. As the
opportunities for effecting sales of equities of IOC and other
profitably functioning companies in the petroleum sector were not
utilised, there was a shortfall of Rs. 7,600 crores in respect of
receipts from the Budget estimate of Rs. 10,000 crores. As
differing opinions have been expressed about the extent of
dilution of ownership in profitably functioning PSEs and the
manner in which sales should be effected, the whole strategy of
disinvestment has undergone a significant change latterly. At a
meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Disinvestment (CCD) held on
June 23 this year, it was decided in principle that there should
be disinvestment in 11 public sector enterprises (PSEs) while 33
PSEs were to be taken up for dilution in the annual plans. During
the course of the year it is proposed that Minerals and Metals
Trading Corporation, Shipping Corporation of India, State Trading
Corporation, Indo-Burma Petroleum, Hindustan Zinc, Hindustan
Organic Chemicals, Hindustan Insecticides, Sponge Iron India,
Minerals Exploration Corporation, Hotel Ranchi Ashok and Hotel
Utkal Ashok should be restructured for enabling strategic sales
to entrepreneurs who can improve efficiency and profitability of
these PSEs. It was also indicated earlier that Air India and
Indian Airlines should be reorganised and the Government
ownership limited to 40 per cent.
While eligible foreign interests are being allowed to take up 26
per cent of the equity capital in Air India and Indian
entrepreneurs can take up a similar stake in Indian Airlines, the
Government will be inclined to effect strategic sale of 25 per
cent in Indian Petrochemicals Corporation (IPCL) to worthy Indian
or foreign managements. Global advisors have been appointed for
making suitable recommendations for restructuring, valuation of
assets and determining prices at which strategic sales of
equities of the PSEs concerned could be concluded. These
exercises are expected to be completed in the coming months in a
transparent manner. It was felt that the Union Finance Ministry
would be enabled to realise the target of Rs. 10,000 crores
through the disinvestment and even exceed it in the current
financial year.
Stock market circles were disappointed over the absence of
announcements relating to sales of equity holdings in Mahanagar
Telephone Nigam (MTNL), Videsh Sanchar Nigam (VSNL) and Maruti
Udyog (MUL). It is not intended for the time being to dilute
Government ownership in oil refining or marketing companies such
as Cochin Refineries (CRL), Chennai Petroleum Corporation (CPCL)
or IBP as these have no integrated facilities for marketing or
refining. The dilution process will be taken up only after these
organisations get integrated with others having marketing as well
as refining facilities. It has also been clarified that the oil
companies have no "strategic status" and the decisions about
disinvestment of portions of holdings in the petroleum sector
will be taken at the appropriate stage.
Immediately, the emphasis will be on restructuring Steel
Authority of India (SAIL) while the Centre is undecided about the
course of action that should be adopted for restructuring or
effecting strategic sale of the Vizakhapatnam Steel Plant. The
Managing Director of Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO) has
actually offered to acquire the Vizakhapatnam Steel Plant as well
as the Salem Steel Plant as the objective of the company would
henceforth be to increase capacity with advantageous
acquisitions. Hindustan Machine Tools (HMT) too is to be
reorganised with the closure of five unviable units. Two
subsidiaries are to be formed for the Machine Tool Division and
Watch Group. It is the intention to divest upto 74 per cent in
these two subsidiaries. Besides, a subsidiary is to be promoted
for the Tractor Division later. As regards Hindustan Organic
Chemicals (HOC), the Government ownership is to be reduced to 26
per cent from 58 per cent with a strategic sale.
Will there be sales to the public?
It is of course stated that 10 per cent of IOC equity capital can
be disposed of later in the year when the reorganisation schemes
take shape. The stake of the Centre in IOC is now 82.30 per cent
after a block of shares was made available to ONGC. While there
may be important developments in the coming months, with the
global advisors submitting their proposals to the Government in
respect of the revamping of PSEs assigned to them, it will also
be examined how the operations of Bharat Aluminium Company
(BALCO), CRPL, Hindustan Teleprinters (HTPL) and others can be
improved with fresh investment by new partners successful in
securing strategic blocks of equities on a negotiated basis. In
view of the new moves adopted by the Union Finance Ministry,
there is confidence that the Budget estimate of Rs.10,000 crores
through disinvestment can be realised.
The recent developments in the political situation however have
had a clouding effect as FIIs and others have been net sellers in
the bourses and the BSE Index slumped to 4188.34 on July 24 from
4905.94 on July 15. The rupee also touched a new low of 45.03 on
July 21 with a heavy demand for dollars from FIIs, importers and
others. As the depreciation of the rupee was unmerited, the
Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) decided to raise the
Bank Rate to 8 per cent from 7 per cent and the cash reserve
ratio (CRR) by half percentage point in two stages to 8.5 per
cent.
The refinance facilities available to banks also have been
severely curtailed. Though the rupee has staged a modest
recovery, the sentiment in bourses is depressed and it will be
possible for the Union Finance Ministry to make a success of the
disinvestment programme only if the institutional investors and
others were inclined to adopt cautiously optimistic view of the
outlook for the bourses. It is hope that the measures adopted by
RBI to check volatility in the forex markets will be temporary.
Happily, the Indian economy has been acquitting itself creditably
and it is anticipated that the gross domestic product (GDP) will
rise by over 7 per cent in 2000-01.
The utilisation of the proceeds from disinvestment for revenue
purposes has not understandably resulted in any contraction of
the internal debt. It has been emphasised that sale proceeds out
of Government holdings in PSEs should be utilised for reducing
the internal debt and also for fresh investment, if need be in
enterprises still under Government management. The stake of the
Centre in various enterprises is still substantial. Even in 1997-
98, the paid-up capital in 236 profitably functioning Central
Public Sector undertakings was Rs.65,760 crores and the net worth
Rs.1,32,440 crores. As the quotations for many scrips can be
expected to rule at high levels, it should not be difficult to
secure at least Rs.1,00,000 crores through disinvestment in three
or four years.
Also, fairly large loans have been made available to numerous
enterprises and these can be recovered with appropriate funding
operations.
The total capital employed was Rs.2,23,050 crores. But internal
debt and other liabilities amounted to Rs.9,72,840.80 crores on
March 31, 2000. If a reduction of Rs.1,50,000 crores can be
achieved through the above mentioned arrangements and efforts
also are made simultaneously to reduce the fiscal deficit, there
will be scope for a noticeable reduction in the burden of
interest charges.
It is therefore important to realise that there should also be a
higher return on investment with improvement in efficiency and
profitability so that non-tax revenues can be augmented tangibly.
The percentage of net profit to capital employed in respect of
the manufacturing sector in 1998-99 was only 4.78 per cent and
those of services sector 4.94 per cent.
The average return for both these groups was 4.83 per cent. Even
if a return of 10 per cent can be secured, the net profit will
get more than doubled to Rs.27,000 crores or an increase of
Rs.14,000 crores. A saving in the burden of interest charges by
over Rs.15,000 crores and a higher level of internally generated
resources of PSEs should strengthen the budgetary position
tangibly.
The disinvestment programme has been vigorously implemented in
other countries as Brazil has benefited to the extent of $66,729
million, Argentina $28,431 million, Mexico $28,302 million, China
$17,467 million, Hungary $12,634 million, Malaysia $10,029
million, Poland $8,281 million and Peru $7,848 million. In the
case of India it is only $7,125 million.
P. A. Seshan
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : FEMA - control or management? Next : Crisil's FAA for IPCL's FD programme | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|