|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, August 07, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Row over report on rape
NEW DELHI, AUG. 6. An official report on rape presented to the
Prime Minister, Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, recently has touched
off a controversy even as the National Commission for Women (NCW)
sought an explanation from the author about the source.
Ironically, the author of the 160-page report, Ms. Poornima
Advani, is a member of the NCW and the report ``Rape - A Legal
Study'' is a publication of the Commission. The report was
presented to Mr. Vajpayee on June 15.
``I have sought an explanation from the member about the
sourcing. The Commission is awaiting the response and it will
decide on its further course of action after receiving the
explanation,'' the NCW chairperson, Ms. Vibha Parthasarathi,
said.
Asked if the portion of the prologue, which various women's
organisations have taken strong exception to, will be deleted,
Ms. Parthasarathi said, ``I cannot say anything at this moment.
Let me get the explanation; only then the Commission will
decide.''
Various women's organisations including the All-India Democratic
Women's Association, the Young Women's Christian Association and
the Indian Association for Women's Studies, strongly protested
the prologue of the report and demanded its deletion to restore
the credibility of an otherwise painstaking document representing
the considered views of the Commission.
The prologue, in its historical evaluation, said, ``An able
position in the household... unfortunately constant invasion by
foreign elements from about the 8th century changed the scenario
to the detriment of women.''
``This is not history but its distortion. Setting aside recent
scholarship on women's studies, scholars on the origins of
patriarchy and oppression of women in ancient India acknowledged
the decline in women's status several centuries before the
compilation of Manusmriti,'' they said.
On the controversy, Ms. Parthasarathi said, ``I had asked for the
explanation much before the controversy started but the member
has been out of town most of the month because of personal
problems.'' Criticising the National Federation of Indian Women
(NFIW) for writing a ``very ill-worded and belligerent'' letter
on the issue, she said, ``This kind of letter is very
uncharacteristic of a women's organisation.'' ``In their letter
to the Commission, the NFIW has described the whole study as a
document of extremely dubious informative worth. How can they
write something like this about a report on such a sensitive
issue such as rape,'' she said.
The author of the report, Ms. Advani, said, ``I have been asked
by the NCW to substantiate with the sources of the report and
most probably I will be able to do it by next weekend.''
Expressing anguish, she said, ``The crux of the report was the
legal aspect of rape and three lines of the prologue have
diverted the issue to a direction which was not meant.''
- PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Bail for accused in Shourie case Next : Govt. undecided on paddy milling | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|