|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 10, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
Chattisgarh Bill okayed
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, AUG. 9. Parliament today gave its nod for the creation
of a separate State of Chattisgarh with the Rajya Sabha passing
the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Bill, 2000 by voice vote. The
Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha last Monday.
Replying to the discussion on the Bill, the Union Home Minister,
Mr. L.K. Advani, said that creation of new States was not the
prescription for development but experience showed that
manageability and administrative viability were indeed ``big
factors'' in ensuring better governance and meeting aspirations
of the people. He also cautioned against attempts of embarking
upon a ``simplistic analysis'' behind the rationale of creating
new States.
The proposed tribal-dominated Chattisgarh State, comprising 16
districts, has a population of 1.75 crore. The Bill had a smooth
passage despite reservations by a few members.
Mr. Advani thanked the main opposition party for extending full
support to the Bill in both Houses. ``It would not have been
possible to get the Bill through without their cooperation and
whole-hearted support,'' he said, pointing to the Congress(I)
benches.
Referring to the demands for statehood from other regions, he
said the resolution by the State Assembly and economic viability
were touchstones for creating new States. Though there was no
constitutional bar on the Centre on creating new States, he said,
the Government had decided to go ahead only if the State Assembly
recommended and forwarded such a proposal.
There was a proposal to set up an advisory board to take care of
the problems of Government employees at the time of creation of
the new State.
Opposition to the Bill came from the Telugu Desam, the CPI(M),
the Samajwadi Party and the AIADMK. In a change of strategy, the
TDP decided to register its protest against the formation of
smaller States with Mr. S. Ramachandra Reddy wondering how the
Centre could meet the financial demands of the new States when it
was refusing funds citing a resource crunch.
The TDP was the only ally of the ruling NDA to express an opinion
against the Bill, which it had avoided when the Lok Sabha
discussed it last week.
Mr. Khagen Das (CPI-M) said the problems of development could not
be solved by dividing the States, and instead suggested concrete
plans for development. Mr. Margabandhu, of the AIADMK, charged it
was a political move aimed at reaping benefits in the Assembly
polls.
The Congress(I) supported the formation of the new State with Mr.
Arjun Singh and Mr. Suresh Pachauri expressing the party's
viewpoint while Mr. Vikram Verma (BJP) stated that creation of
Chhatisgarh firmed the natural geographical division of the
State.
Vidarbha demand resurfaces
By Our Special Correspondent
MUMBAI, AUG. 9. As a separate state of Chhatisgarh is being
carved out, the old demand for a Vidarbha state is being revived
in Maharashtra.
About 17 Congress(I) legislators from the region met here today
and chalked out a programme for moulding public opinion to making
a forceful plea in the winter session of the State Legislature in
Nagpur.
The convener of the Separate Vidarbha State Coordination
Committee, Mr. Nitin Raut, told reporters that he along with his
colleagues - 27 Congress(I) legislators from the region - were
elected on the promise of supporting the formation of the new
state.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : Abdullah confident of talks with other groups | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|