|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, August 10, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Concern over status of AI after privatisation
By T. S. Shankar
CHENNAI, AUG. 9. Who will exercise effective management control
over India's national carrier, Air India, when it is privatised
is the question that is uppermost in the minds of aviation
watchers.
The two other important issues that are of concern relate to the
status and shape of the privatised Air India and the role it
would play in the nation's economy. These will determine whether
Air India will become a subsidiary of a foreign airline or of
foreign interests or whether irrespective of its partial
privatisation, it will serve the national interests as the
flagship international airline of the country.
The Government announced recently, a proposal to reduce its
current 100 per cent shareholding in Air India to 40 per cent and
sell 40 (26 + 14) per cent to a strategic partner which can be a
joint venture between an Indian and a foreign equity including a
foreign airline. Of the balance 20 per cent, it is proposed that
10 per cent will be sold to employees and 10 per cent to domestic
financial institutions and investors in the Indian capital
market.
Many countries have recently reduced the Government holding in
their national carriers or have formulated policies in that
direction and have prohibited foreigners from having a majority
share of the equity and from assuming management control of the
airline as seen in Australia, China, Mexico, South Africa,
Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and the United States. This clearly
demonstrated that universally, management control and majority
equity participation by foreign nationals, including foreign
airlines, in the national carriers are not palatable for several
reasons viz - strategic, national, defence, political and
economic ones.
A 26 per cent shareholding, as per the Indian Companies Act, will
enable the foreign partner to exercise a veto power at the AGM
which in turn will enable the foreign partner to veto any special
resolutions even though such resolutions may have the support of
the remaining majority shareholders; A 26 per cent stake will
enable the foreign entity in the Joint Venture/Consortium to
become the dominant player since the Indian strategic partner
will have a maximum shareholding of 14 per cent out of the 40 per
cent proposed to be sold to the strategic partner.
To protect its interests, the foreign strategic partner will also
ensure that the Indian partner becomes a minor player within the
strategic partnership and not on equal partner in the decision-
making process. In view of the Government's intent to give up its
role in the day- to-day running of the airline, a 26 per cent
shareholding for the foreign partner, will, in real terms, result
in the foreign partner managing and administering the airline.
While divesting 40 per cent, the Government must also spell out a
broad aviation policy and national obligations to the strategic
partner. Only then can the status of Air India as the nation's
international airline be protected.
No dearth of talent
At this juncture, key players in the aviation industry underscore
the importance of providing 26 per cent stake for the foreign
partner, as otherwise, they would not be willing to enter this
highly competitive industry on a charity note. ``If the foreign
airline does not hold a veto power, then the very purpose of its
entry is defeated'', explained another source in the airline
industry.It is clear that there is no dearth of talents for
reviving Air India. There are Indians available here and all over
the world who are capable of undertaking this task. In this
context, Indians have proved themselves time and again as being
second to none. Two of the world's largest airlines, the United
Airlines and the U.S. Air - are both headed by Indians - Mr. Ronu
Dutta and Mr. Rakesh Gangwal respectively.
Experts suggest that the strategic partner should be given the
right to nominate 50 per cent of the Board of Directors, the
Indian partners in the strategic partnership should nominate the
Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Indian/NRI investors
in the strategic partners consortium should be given the right of
first refusal to acquire the remaining 40 per cent equity when
the same is offloaded by the Government in future to ensure that
at no point of time the foreign partner's shareholding exceeds
the limit.
The concerns raised that a 25 to 26 per cent offer in the
shareholding will not be attractive enough to lure bids from
serious airlines appear to be unfounded. From available
indicators, it is known that international airlines of repute
like British Airways, Singapore Airlines and Air France have all
shown keen interest in bidding for selection as the strategic
partner in the partnership with Indian entities including Jet
Airways.
The Government should ensure that while Air India is permitted to
draw upon whatever world class airlines offer, it does not become
an adjunct of any foreign airlines.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : AG saves official from court's wrath Next : Nijalingappa - man of grace and compassion | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|