|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, August 26, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
NSS not to back Karunakaran
By George Jacob
KOTTAYAM, AUG. 25. The efforts of the senior Congress(I) leader,
Mr. K. Karunakaran, and his loyalists to precipitate another bout
of factional war in the party, appear to have received a lukewarm
reception from the leader's longtime ally, the Nair Service
Society.
NSS sources close to the leadership made it clear that "if Mr.
Karunakaran and those with him expect any support from the NSS in
their newest adventure, they are grossly mistaken".
This unexpected turn around in the relationship between the
`leader' and the NSS is based on the latter's assumption that the
sole aim of Mr. Karunakaran's rebellion is announcing his son as
his successor. "We firmly believe that Mr. Karunakaran is
sacrificing the future of scores of other youngsters, whether
they belong to the Nair community or not," said one senior
leader.
According to him, as far as the NSS is concerned, there is only
one Congress party. "Even if you want us to recognise the two
factions, we would like to keep equal distance from them," he
added. The general impression among the leaders is that Mr.
Karunakaran's present efforts would only ruin "whatever is left
of that party".
The sources said that there had so far been no feelers from the
Karunakaran camp seeking support. "However, such an impression
has been created and that is why we want to clarify our
position," he said.
The NSS, through its political arm, the National Democratic Party
(NDP), had been one of Mr. Karunakaran's staunchest allies ever
since the formation of the United Democratic Front. While the NSS
had kept itself away from the factional war within the
Congress(I), Mr. Karunakaran could always have found a helping
hand in the NSS all these years. Even during the worst crisis in
Mr. Karunakaran's political career, at the end of which he had to
make an ignominious exit as Chief Minister in the mid-Nineties,
the NSS had put in a strong case for him, criticising the
coalition partners for their political immaturity in involving in
the internal matters of the Congress(I).
The soured relationship with the new leaders in the Congress(I)
and also with some of the coalition partners had resulted in the
voluntary exit of the NDP from the coalition with a call to
defeat its former allies in the 1995 Assembly polls. The outcome
of the 1995 polls proved the NSS leadership correct and it was
after that they came out with the policy of `equi-distance' from
both the major political formations in the State. Even then, the
NSS had maintained a cozy relationship with Mr. Karunakaran. It
was none other than the `leader' who was selected by the NSS to
unveil a statue of its founding father, Mannathu Padmanabhan, at
Vaikom last year. This in fact was a great boost to the sagging
image of Mr. Karunakaran, who could prove that his relationship
with his base constituency was still intact.
One reason for the sudden change in the attitude of the NSS might
be that it wanted to make it clear to the `leader' that it is not
so much impressed by the performance of Mr. K. Muraleedharan and
that it will not tolerate any attempt to impose him on the NSS.
In other words, the NSS would like to choose its own spokesman
for them in the Congress(I). Another reason might be that, sure
of its influence over the Karunakaran camp and the effects of its
stance over the future of the present rebellion, it wanted to
exert pressure on the emerging scenario in the Congress(I).
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Crucial Karunakaran faction meeting today Next : Jawan laid to rest | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|