|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, August 26, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
An attempt to cover transparency
DO NOT do this; and do not do that. The code of conduct
formulated by the Board is a document which excels in projecting
the archaic thinking of the cricket body. Not surprising at all
considering the administrative abilities of its members.
The need to have a code of conduct is well understood in these
times of professionalism but this document is a piece of work
which would reduce the cricketers to sort of bonded labourers. A
matured sportsman, one who makes a living by playing, knows how
to protect himself from evil elements. What he needs is guidance
and not such a diktat from a bunch of unprofessional heads.
Because of four or five tainted individuals, the rest cannot be
branded in the same category. It is the exemplary conduct of the
clean cricketers that needs to be highlighted and emulated.
The code of conduct released by the Board concentrates on ways to
prevent the players from coming into contact with undesirable
elements. There is an extensive section devoted to instructions
on how to keep away bookies and matchfixers, with heavy fines and
exclusion from the team putting the fear in the minds of the
players. There are strict guidelines to players and team
officials and the ultimate conclusion is that it is a neat
attempt to close all avenues of interaction between the players
and the rest of the world.
No relatives or friends in the same hotel; no cell phone; no
interaction with the media; no permission to write in newspapers
and magazines (a welcome move since it only encourages ill-
feelings within the team). There are some ridiculous clauses
under the section `additional regulations for players and team
officials' and overall it only shows the Board in a poor light as
the attempt is clearly to put a cover on transparency.
There are a couple of interesting, but long overdue, points
regarding the players' behaviour. One refers to all players and
team officials to attend all official functions strictly in
accordance with the dress regulations as prescribed by the Board.
This should make Sunil Gavaskar happy for it was at a function
organised under his guidance in Nairobi last year that the Indian
team shockingly appeared in casual attire when the occasion
demanded a formal dress.
Also welcome is the instruction to all players and team officials
to attend all prize distribution ceremonies after every match in
proper cricket attire. One has come across players at such
ceremonies in sandals and slippers. It is a shame that these
professional cricketers have to be told to behave like
professionals but then the poor behaviour of the Indian team over
the years has necessitated introduction of such steps.
The Board would do well to have a stricter code for the players
when it comes to their interaction with fans. It should be made
mandatory for players, with special note for the `fast' bowlers,
to sign autographs and sign with a smile. At public functions
too, especially when abroad, the team would do better not to
huddle in one corner and wait for the food to be served. Many
High Commissioners would have tales to tell of indifferent
behaviour of the Indian team, particularly during the period when
a physiotherapist looked after jobs meant for the manager.
Glum faced cricketers at public functions is bad advertisement
for Indian cricket and the team should be put through a one-day
course before every tour to make the players realise their duties
towards their fans and the media. These modern day Indian
cricketers should be made to understand that they are ambassadors
of their country and not some super stars as they were erringly
made out to be even when they were winning nothing.
The cricketers should conduct themselves with dignity, learn to
respect their opponents and importantly get rid of agents to
promote them. Their cricket is the best way to promote themselves
and let the so-called stars understand that dollars will follow
once they start performing. None grudges them making millions but
in the process let not the cricketer become a puppet in the hands
of unscrupulous marketing agents. It is these self-promoting
agents who create a wall between the cricketers and their well-
wishers.The code of conduct for players shall serve no purpose if
the Board members are allowed to have an unreasonable say. How
about a code of conduct for the Board members.
To begin with it should be mandatory for the Board to discuss the
game and not just allotment of matches and appointment of
managers for tours. It should be mandatory that no Board member
shall accompany the team as manager. Let there be a professional
manager who should be given the specific job for a minimum period
of two years. The vote-oriented politics of the Board would thus
be taken care of and there could be more place for the players in
the cricket administration.
The Board should introduce a clause to direct all staging
associations to take effective measures regarding spectator
comfort during matches. Why should the paying public suffer while
these Board members enjoy five-star status. It is time the Board
spared a thought for the spectators instead of talking of pitches
which can be transported. That idea can wait.
The Board was expected to take a decision on the appointment of a
media manager but conveniently ignored the issue. It is more than
one year since the Board has been talking of having a media
manager. ``We shall soon invite applications through
advertisement in the media'' the Board president, Mr. A. C.
Muthiah had claimed a month back. We are yet to hear from the
Board on this subject.
This talk of strict code of conduct is fine, it will certainly
bring about a change in the attitude of the players, but what
about the Board and its officials. Without losing time, the Board
should find a permanent place to locate its headquarters and
discourage affairs being run from the Eden Gardens. It has not
helped Indian cricket at all.
And finally, if the Board is serious about improving its image by
trying to shake off the tainted players from the team, no tainted
official should be allowed to have anything to do with the
running of the game in any part of the country.
VIJAY LOKAPALLY
New Delhi
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Proteas humble Kiwis Next : A time to act, not pull punches | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|