|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, September 04, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Ranil may find it tough to tackle Chandrika
By Nirupama Subramanian
COLOMBO, SEPT. 3. In France, they call it cohabitation and it
works reasonably well. In the United States, except for the first
two years of the President, Mr. Bill Clinton's first tenure when
the Democrats enjoyed a majority in Congress, the President's
party has not controlled the House of Representatives for several
years. The question being asked in the run-up to the October 10
parliamentary elections in Sri Lanka is, what might be the
consequences if it happens here?
If the United National Party (UNP) were to emerge victorious in
the election, it would be the first time in Sri Lanka that the
President's party would not be in control of Parliament, not
counting the brief three months between August and November 1994,
when Ms. Chandrika Kumaratunga's People's Alliance (PA)
government functioned along side the Presidency of Mr. D.B.
Wijetunge of the UNP.
Already, the UNP leader, Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe, who has
claimed that his party would win the elections, is painting post-
poll scenarios in which he would not only form the Government,
but also turn Ms. Kumaratunga into a lame duck President.
``When the UNP wins the majority in the coming election, the
executive decisions will be made by me and the UNP Cabinet. After
October 12, President Chandrika Kumaratunga will not be able to
act independently,'' he declared at a press conference earlier
this week. He said until such time as his Government brought in
amendments to abolish the Executive Presidency, the President
would have to act on the advice of Parliament and the Cabinet in
accordance with the provisions in the 1978 Constitution that Sri
Lanka now follows. The armed forces and the police would also
have to take orders from the Cabinet and Parliament. Mr.
Wickremesinghe's assertion is based on the power of Parliament to
block the President's access to finances which, in turn, would
prevent her from exercising her powers. The President has powers
to dissolve Parliament, but not before a full year after it has
been constituted.
But constitutional experts believe Mr. Wickremesinghe may not
find it easy to clip the wings of the most powerful Executive
President in the world. ``He is underestimating the powers of the
President of Sri Lanka. Between Parliament and President, the
balance of power is very much in favour of the President,'' said
Mr. Rohan Edirisinghe of the University of Colombo Law Faculty.
And unlike Mr. Wijetunge, Ms. Kumaratunga is no pushover
President. To begin with, the President may not even appoint Mr.
Wickremesinghe as Prime Minister. Article 43 of the Constitution
says the President can appoint as Prime Minister a Member of
Parliament who ``in (her) opinion'' is most likely to command the
confidence of the House.
``The President may decide, that in her opinion, Mr. Ranil
Wickremesinghe does not command the confidence of Parliament. She
could appoint anyone she likes. It provides her with an
opportunity to undermine his leadership of the UNP and create
fissures in the party,'' said Mr. Edirisinghe.
Under the draconian provisions of the 1978 Constitution, the
President is also empowered to assign to herself any Cabinet
portfolio, with no limit on the number of portfolios she can
hold, and thus considerably reduce the hold of the Prime Minister
over the Cabinet.
Mr. Wickremesinghe quoted Article 42 of the Constitution to point
out that the President ``shall be responsible to Parliament for
the due exercise, performance and discharge of (her) powers,
duties and functions''.
But the President is not answerable or accountable to Parliament.
She need not attend sessions and enjoys immunity from being
criticised in the House. Under the prevailing Emergency, the
President may pass regulations that override laws enacted by
Parliament. The House may vote against the Emergency when it
comes up for the monthly extension, but the President could clamp
it again for at least a month. With both the President and
Parliament empowered to chip away at each other, and given the
hostility between the PA and the UNP, cohabitation, French style,
may not be possible. Indeed, Executive deadlock for at least a
year is the most likely scenario if the UNP wins the elections.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Minorities in Bangladesh to get back seized property Next : Britain to relax immigration controls | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|