|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, September 04, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
Will Govt. give in to pressure on escrow cover?
By Divya Sreedharan
BANGALORE, SEPT. 3. The controversial Mangalore power project may
force the State Government to backtrack on its ``no escrow''
stand. The Government's refusal to provide escrow cover for the
project is apparently hampering its progress. In fact, the
promoters of the Mangalore Power Company (MPC), the Hong Kong-
based China Light and Power (CLP), and Tata Electric are said to
be ``unwilling to go ahead'' with the way things are at present.
The Government's stance on escrow cover - which is in effect a
security blanket or a government-held fund which assures power
suppliers that they will be paid on time for the power supplied -
dates back to the days when MPC was promoted by Cogentrix and
CLP.
In December last year, the State Cabinet categorically opposed
MPC's escrow demand. Following that, MPC stopped its work on the
$1.3 billion 1013 MW thermal power plant at Nandikur in
Mangalore. The Cabinet accepted the Deepak Parekh committee
recommendations (against providing escrow cover keeping in mind
the State power utility's dire financial conditions) in January.
But, later, a High Court directive obliged the Government to
provide escrow for the 220 MW Tannir Bhavi power project.
The Centre is said to have already turned down Karnataka's
proposal of counter-guarantee without an escrow for the MPC
project. Instead, it has suggested that escrow be put in place 90
days before actual operations commence.
Questioned on the issue, the Principal Energy Secretary, Mr.
P.S.S.Thomas, admitted that the State was, at the moment, having
discussions with the Centre.Would the Centre's recent decision to
review all power projects in the States have implications on MPC?
Mr. Thomas pointed out that the review was meant to examine the
``progress of the projects'' and would not impede the MPC in any
way.
Mr. Thomas stressed that the final decision would not be
Karnataka's alone. ``It has to be a combined decision by the
Centre and the State''.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Routine investigation severely hampered Next : BJP may take tough stand against Shivappa | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|