|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, September 21, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
CII favours U.K. model for competition law
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, SEPT. 19. The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)
has stated that there was a need to follow the U.K. example to
effectively implement competition law in the country.
Commenting on the Raghavan Committee report on Competition Policy
and Law, the CII, in a press release issued here, suggested that
like in the U.K. the law could be enacted first and allowed to
come into force in the next 12 to 18 months. This should be
adequate time for building up institutional capability to
implement the law. The interim period should be used to design
appropriate institutional structures and get the right type of
people to man these institutions. The CII has submitted a
detailed set of recommendations to the Government recently in
this regard.
The CII says the law to be flexible enough to incorporate any
changes that would be needed in the ever-changing scenario. The
law should be dynamic and responsive to the needs of the market
in a competitive environment. The law, it feels should be
prepared with detailed merger guidelines. Key elements such as
merger and other anti-competition activities should be clearly
defined. The CII has also called for a review of the provisions
relating to mergers and acquisitions. The Raghavan Committee
report had suggested that mergers resulting in entities with
assets of Rs. 500 crores and groups with assets of Rs. 2,000
crores must go through a pre-notification process. If no order is
passed by the Competition Commission of India (CII) within 90
days, the merger is deemed to be approved.
According to CII, the committee's recommendation with regard to
mergers seems to stem from a fear that these would lead to
monopolies.
It has pointed out that apart from the fact that this is somewhat
opposed to their terms of reference, there seems to be no reason
why these cannot be considered by the High Court which
necessarily have to approve mergers under the Companies Act.
The chamber has therefore suggested that instead of an additional
set of procedures before the Competition Commission that may lead
to a delay, these issues can be addressed in a holistic and
cohesive manner by the High Court, where the commission can play
an advocacy role.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : It is still gloomy for the plantations Next : medybiz.com's funding plans | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|