|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Friday, September 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Southern States
| Previous
| Next
VVIP convoys causing traffic jam
By K. Srinivas Reddy
HYDERABAD, SEPT. 28. Believe it or not, vehicular traffic in the
Hi-tech City comes to a grinding halt on many of the main
arterial routes at least 16 times a day on an average leading to
massive traffic jam.
You are mistaken if you think increasing number of vehicles or
narrow roads are the reasons for such jam. These are rather
enforced by the police to ensure a `non-stop cruise' for the VVIP
convoys which whiz past at great speed while the regular commuter
is forced to wait for at least 15 to 30 minutes to get out of the
subsequent traffic jam.
If the log books maintained by the police are any indication, the
convoys of six VVIPs criss-crossed the city roads over 850 times
from August 1 onwards with the daily average working out to
around 16 trips. Mind you, for every trip, traffic will have to
be halted at every junction on all directions, irrespective of
the timings.
`Green Channel', as the city police would term the hold-up of
traffic for the sake of convoy movement, is extended to eight
functionaries - Governor, Chief Minister, Chief Justice, Home
Minister, former Home Minister, Lok Sabha Speaker, Assembly
Speaker and former Prime Ministers. Incidentally, Hyderabad is
the only city to have so many dignitaries enjoying the Green
Channel while in other metros traffic is stopped for only three
or four dignitaries.
If one were to take the example of Delhi, Governor, Chief
Minister, Supreme Court Chief Justice and former Prime Ministers
are given the facility. Similar is the case with Chennai and
Bangalore. But in Mumbai only Governor, Chief Minister and former
Premiers cruise along without stopping anywhere.
Why should Hyderabad have so many dignitaries having this
facility? Primarily security considerations demand that the VVIP
convoys do not get entangled in the regular traffic. But the moot
point would be how many of them are `targets'? Police officers
agree that threat perception is minimal for some of them. In that
case shouldn't the inconvenience to the general public be also
considered by the police? Police officers agree that it is high
time the facility was curtailed. But who is to bell the cat?
Would the police have a relook at extending Green Channel? The
police have been thinking on these lines, but nothing seems to
have been decided. In addition to the regular traffic snarls, the
VVIP movements throw the normal functioning of the police out of
gear since all men and officers are called out on the roads. It
is not as if the VVIPs are not unaware of the sufferings of the
common man. Sometimes, they proudly announce that they would not
use the siren and that their movement would not affect others.
But invariably, they go back on their word.
"How much fuel is getting burnt and how much time is wasted just
for the sake of so-called security of the VVIP. If they are so
insecure, why can't they live near their offices and curtail
their movements. Has any police officer or the VVIP thought about
the inconvenience caused to the public?" B. Venkateshwar Rao, a
motorcyclist caught in the traffic jam the other day, complains
bitterly. Are there any listeners?
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Southern States Previous : Joint operations to check EEZ poaching Next : LPG as fuel in motor vehicles notified | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|