|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 08, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
U.S. wins medal count, but other countries also have reason to celebrate
THE U.S. success began with a surprise, on a Saturday morning
nearly 20 miles west of downtown Sydney in an agricultural area
known as the Cumberland Plain. Nancy Johnson won the first gold
medal of the 2000 Olympic Games, and did so in an upset at the
10-metre air rifle event.
It ended 15 days later, with something preordained, even if it
was startlingly close - a U.S. victory in the men's basketball
tournament.
The United States won 97 medals in all, 39 gold, more than any
other country in either category. From baseball to beach
volleyball, from swimming to softball, the Americans were
dominant. The U.S. team provided engaging stories and standout
performances in unexpected places, like the Greco-Roman wrestler
Rulon Gardner, and also when the spotlight was brightest, as with
Marion Jones, Maurice Greene and Michael Johnson.
But these Games brought evidence that several national athletic
programmes are growing stronger.
The Russian Federation won medals in 23 sports - more than anyone
- and won the second most medals overall (88) and the second most
gold medals (32).
China, despite leaving behind 27 athletes suspended for drug
testing problems, was third in the medals tally with 59, 28 of
them gold. It won medals in a dozen sports, and had a
stranglehold on diving, where it won five golds and five silvers.
It won eight table tennis medals, including golds in all four
categories. It also won its first men's team gymnastics gold
medal.
Host Australia had its best showing in an Olympic Games. The
Aussies wanted to put on a good show, they also wanted to perform
well, having poured millions into nation-wide sporting programmes
after a dismal medal count at the 1976 Olympics in Montreal.
For a nation of 18 million, the Australians kept up with the
largest nations in the world, finishing fourth in the medal count
with 58 and also finishing fourth in gold medals with 16. Germany
was fifth with 57 medals, 14 gold.
The countries of the former Soviet Union had an extremely strong
showing. Excluding Russia, 12 countries formed by the breakup of
the Soviet Union won medals in Sydney: Belarus, Uzbekistan,
Georgia, Lithuania, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Estonia,
Moldova, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine.
If you combined their totals at the Sydney Games - as if the
Soviet Union were still together - they would have won 48 gold
medals, 48 silver medals and 67 bronze medals, or 163 medals
overall. That dwarfs any other country's total.
The Americans shined in the areas that were expected. The men's
and women's basketball teams won, the softball team won, and
while the Australians started strong in swimming, the Americans
eventually took control. The United States won 33 swimming
medals, including 14 gold medals.
U.S. boxers, expected to be among the strongest U.S. teams in 24
years, started well but faltered later, failing to win a gold
medal for the first time since 1948 (excluding the boycotted 1980
Games).
Marion Jones didn't win five gold medals, but she did capture
three gold medals and two bronze. Greene and Johnson won two gold
medals each.
The U.S. baseball team beat the mighty Cubans, pulling off an
upset that harkened back to the 1980 Olympic hockey team.
Gardner, meanwhile, beat the Russian wrestling legend Alexander
Karelin, who had never lost in a major international competition.
``I'm dreaming this great dream,'' Gardner said several days
after winning his gold. ``I wake up every morning thinking, this
dream is a great one.''
The U.S. softball pitcher Lisa Fernandez, whose team had to win
five consecutive games after losing three in a row, said these
Games would be remembered for the high level of competition.
``Just look at our story,'' Fernandez said. ``Here's a team that
came in with a 110-game winning streak, and we got beat three in
a row. It shows how far the other countries have come. The
playing field is levelling. Maybe in most sports.
``That's what was great about these Games. We had cable satellite
feeds in our Olympic village and we would come back from a game
or practice and watch all kinds of sports, just everything. The
competition level was so high.''
That proved to be true to the very end, with France, never an
Olympic basketball power, testing the United States in the final
minutes of the men's basketball final.
An Olympic Games of surprises almost had one last one in it.
- New York Times News Service
BILL PENNINGTON
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : A lively affair in store Next : Aussie Games bought time for Olympics | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|