|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, October 08, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Revolution dotcom
JAPANESE Prime Minister Mr. Yoshiro Mori has made information
technology a key plank of his economic policies. A governmental
high power panel that wants Japan to overtake the United States
as a high speed IT giant by 2005 has come out with the outline of
a bill to be tabled in the current session of Parliament. The
expert panel has required the government to identify high
priority projects with clear goals and set time frames to help
Japan fully harness its infotech potential - experts asking the
bureaucrats for guidance, a case of putting wolves in charge of
the chicken coops. It is a moot point if the credit for launching
the IT revolution should go in full to Mr. Mori or in part to his
predecessor in office Mr. Keizo Obuchi, who visualised "Better
Governance in the New Millennium" and had set up a commission in
March 1999 to prepare a blueprint for this purpose.
Without entering into the details of the recommendations of Mr.
Obuchi's Commission for the New Millennium it is suffice to say
that the core of the Commission's recommendations had pleaded
among other things for "for global literacy". The basic elements
of the "global literacy" are the mastery of information
technology tools such as computers and the internet and the
mastery of English as the international lingua franca. The
information technology revolution visualises in particular the
rapid development of the internet, upgrading its infrastructure
and strengthening its IT training. While the full report has not
come for public debate as was visualised and the recommendations
are kept under wraps, the Mori Government has suddenly launched
an aggressive IT offensive, thanks to the recent G-8 Okinawa
Summit on "digital divide".
Commenting on the Government's ambitious drive to catch up with
the U.S. on information technology, Japan's famous management
guru (and a former partner in McInsey and Co.), Dr. Kenichi Ohmae
has said that the government's plans are a "sham" being foisted
on the Japanese people. Dr. Ohmae has said that Japan does not
have the required education system. He described language
difficulties as among the biggest barriers confronting the
Japanese people. He pointed out that Singapore, Hong Kong and
India are successful IT societies because of their mastery of
English. Besides, the government has not carried out fundamental
changes in legislation to create an IT revolution in society.
Even according to the government there are 733 regulations and
124 laws obstructing E-commerce and "vested interests like
accountants, lawyers and teachers' unions" are opposed to changes
as they fear the consequences of the promotion of an "On Line
Government" by 2003. Dr. Ohmae declares in a recent article that
the "IT revolution won't happen" in Japan.
The IT outline approved by the expert's panel and passed on to
the government for whetting was reported to be full of lofty
ideas. For example, it suggests that the private sector take the
lead in powering the IT reforms and the role of government should
be limited to promoting fair competition. There are some who
suspect that the whole exercise was an attempted cover-up of the
mega expenditure on traditional roads and bridges through
diversion of funds to the information highway - "part of a smoke-
screen for the old style pork barrel spending". The new scheme,
it is reported, contemplates the issuance of "IT vouchers" to 100
million people over the age of 20 who would each receive vouchers
worth about 60,000 Yen (approximate $ 55) to help defray the cost
of courses in the use of computers and the internet. The
estimated cost of the exchequer is expected to be 300 billion
Yen. It is not surprising that Dr. Ohmae has accused the
government of being misguided by some strong private interests.
He has pointed accusing fingers at Sony, Fujitsu and Toshiba in
particular, and said that between them they will sell 40 million
of their own computers to the government as part of the policy
they have outlined for the government. In these days of dog
eating dog in politics or business, no comments on the story,
even if true.
There is then the other side of this misadventure. As an
increasing number of foreign companies flock to open shop in
Japan's budding internet market, the world's second largest, they
are discovering a process far more laborious than they imagined.
Apart from the traditional regulatory hurdles that are integral
to Japan's cosy corporate environment, many non-Japanese
companies hoping to offer internet-based services are finding
that they have to tackle problems of internationalisation in some
areas, which means rebuilding entire programmes. It is said that
the difference between localising a web page and
internationalising its underlying source code can be seen as
analogous to the difference between writing computer manuals and
writing software. To wish for quick results in a long drawn out
exercise, will make a well-meaning reform an exercise in
futility.
Japan's economy has been in and out of recession so many times in
the last ten years. Prof. Hajime Karatsu of Tokoi University in
Tokyo who headed a special panel set up by the late Mr. Obuchi to
examine industrial competitiveness is convinced that Japan's
decline is related to the decline of its manufacturing industry.
A fundamental problem facing Japan's economy, according to the
annual white paper on international trade of the Ministry of
Trade and Industry (MITI), is that the manufacturing sector is
losing its overall competitiveness in world markets. Whereas the
financial sector (including the banking sector) is officially
promoted through measures such as Japan's "Big Bang", the
manufacturing sector is left to fend for itself and the focus on
glamorous new industries such as information technology has cast
into shadow the once strong image of the manufacturing sector,
especially among the younger workers. While the future is in the
dotcom companies, what is the future of the dotcom companies
themselves?
Goldman Sachs, the international investment banker, predicts that
the world market for international services in information
technology will grow from $ 349 billion in 1999 to $ 585 billion
four years from now. It is often heard that it is the dotcoms
that are in the service sector, which will rake in larger profits
than those that provide goods. It must, however, be remembered
that the expected massive inflow of profits from IT transactions
on the Net cannot be the substitute for real growth in the
manufacturing sector. What Japan needs is a strong dose of fiscal
reform to pull itself out of the quagmire it is in. Even IT
companies will not usher in a revolution unless it is preceded by
the necessary reforms in the education system. First thing first
should be the guideline and Japan is bound to succeed in the
"third industrial revolution" given the Japanese penchant for
making virtue out of necessity.
N. KRISHNASWAMI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Back to Nature Next : New software to delete computer virus | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|