|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, October 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Sec. 32(a) of Narcotics Act unconstitutional: SC
NEW DELHI, OCT. 13. In a major relief to persons convicted under
the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the Supreme
Court has held Section 32(a) of the act to be unconstitutional to
the extent it barred courts from suspending the sentence.
Upholding arguments on behalf of an accused Jiti, a bench
comprising Mr. Justice K.T. Thomas, Mr. Justice R.P. Sethi and
Mr. Justice S.N. Variava said ``Section 32(a) is unconstitutional
to the extent it takes away the right of the court to suspend the
sentence of a convict under the act.'' Justice Sethi, writing the
judgement for the bench, also said that section 32(a) did not in
any way affect the powers of the authorities to grant parole to
the convict.
He said, ``It is clear that parole did not amount to the
suspension, remission or commutation of sentence which could be
withheld under the garb of Section 32(a) of the act.'' Justice
Sethi said in the absence of the right of suspending a sentence,
the right of appeal conferred upon the accused was termed to be a
right of infructuous appeal.
As judicial review was the heart and soul of the legal system,
``the section, so far as it completely debars the appellate
courts from the power to suspend the sentence awarded to a
convict under the act, cannot stand the test of
constitutionality,'' he said.
However, the bench, despite holding Section 32(a) partially
unconstitutional, said ``the section, in so far as it takes away
the right of the executive to suspend, remit and commute the
sentence, is valid.''
Coming to the appellate court's power to suspend a sentence,
Justice Sethi said a sentence awarded under the act ``can be
suspended by the appellate court only and strictly subject to the
conditions spelt out in Section 37 of the act.'' However, he said
the declaration of the Section 32(a) to be unconstitutional, in
so far as it affects the functioning of the courts in the
country, would not render the whole of the section invalid.
- PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Appointed SC judges Next : Indo-Japan cooperation on e-governance | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|