|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, October 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
EC's criteria
Sir, - The derecognition of the CPI(M) as a national party brings
to the fore the irrationality of the criteria so far adopted by
the Election Commission for recognition of a political party as
national or state party. All States/UTs do not have the same
population nor is it the same for all constituencies. Therefore,
any criteria based on the number of seats or number of States/UTs
is bound to lead to illogical conclusions. It is time for the EC
to recognise that the Symbol Order is simply outdated and needs
to be thrown into the dustbin of history. What is needed is a
fresh approach to the problem of classification of registered
parties, going back to the first principles.
The Lok Sabha represents the people of India as a whole. Any
political party, which secures, say 5 per cent of the valid votes
cast in a general election, irrespective of the constituencies or
States where it has secured its votes, should be classified as a
national party, and should enjoy the privilege of a common
symbol, wherever it puts up a candidate.
Assembly elections are no longer coterminus with the Lok Sabha
election. Therefore, they can be dealt with separately. Any party
which secures, say 5 per cent of the votes in the State Assembly
election should be categorised as a State party for that State
and should have the privilege of a common symbol in that State.
A national party, by definition, may contest some, if not all,
Assembly elections and qualify to be a State party in some States
also. Similarly a State party may contest the Lok Sabha elections
and, in certain circumstances, qualify to become a national
party.
If a national party is also a State party in some States, it
should be allotted the same symbol to fight the Assembly election
in those States. Similarly a State party, which has been
recognised as a State party in more than one State, may be
allotted the same symbol in all of them.
It is important that the status of all parties should be reviewed
immediately after every Lok Sabha and Assembly election, since
the political situation changes from election to election.
Another reform in the election procedure is overdue. The present
practice of mentioning party and symbol in the nomination form
should be done away with, as even the major national parties are
unable to make a final choice of candidates in time which gives
rise to many complications - sometimes to piquant situations. I
think that the candidate should be asked to submit the party's
ticket only on the date of scrutiny and the R.O. should then
allot the symbols.
Syed Shahabuddin,
New Delhi
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Vidarbha and Statehood Next : Long-suppressed report | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|