|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, October 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
A mixed picture
THE MID-TERM REVIEW of the Ninth Plan by a full meeting of the
Planning Commission (PC), presided over by the Prime Minister,
Mr. A. B. Vajpayee, recently has come to terms with reality.
Without being too optimistic on the growth prospects, the PC has
painted a grim picture, pointing to all-round slippages in
targets and performance. During the first three years of the plan
period (1997-2000), the Gross Domestic Product is estimated to
have grown at only 6.1 per cent, against a toned down target of
6.5 per cent for the five-year plan. To achieve that goal, the
economy will have to grow at 7.1 per cent in the two remaining
years and this looks unlikely. The RBI has also lowered the
growth projection. There are two very striking features which
stand out in the assessment - first, the three States of Bihar,
Uttar Pradesh and Orissa are dragging down national growth and
need to be pulled up; second, women continue to bear the burden
of both poverty and illiteracy. Unless the PC, the Centre and the
States take on the challenge and arrest this trend, it could hurt
growth prospects of the country in the medium and the long term.
Another glaring factor, though well-known, is the continuing
growth in Government expenditure and a shortfall in projected
revenue collections.
The Centre and the States have to share the blame for the fiscal
health of the Governments. The main problem appears to be the
sharp fall in investments by the States, which will adversely
impact on key segments of the economy such as agriculture, health
and education. The review showed that the States were able to
mobilise only 44.4 per cent of the projected resources in three
years and their investment was not likely to cross 67 per cent of
the original target. The Electricity Boards remain the white
elephants. The Centre too was culpable, with a shortfall of 8.6
per cent in gross budgetary support. It could provide only less
than 50 per cent of the projected resources for its own plan.
Hence, the total outlay for the public sector was likely to be
only 86 per cent of the Plan target, while public investment
would fall to just 81 per cent. The trend of increased borrowings
by both the Centre and the States was worrisome as it would widen
fiscal deficit beyond sustainable levels. The performance of the
public sector undertakings, both Central and State, left a lot to
be desired and the best way out of this crisis seems to be to
speed up the process of disinvestment or privatisation.
Instead of stopping with fault-finding, the PC has come up with
several key recommendations: increase user charges for power,
irrigation, urban water supply, health, education and Government
housing; rationalise the railway tariff structure within five
years; raise the tax-GDP ratio by three percentage points by
2007; downsize Government; pursue civil administration and
judicial reform, and restructure poverty alleviation programmes.
Above all, the Centre and the States must set aside political
differences, jettison populist schemes and set a reasonable time-
frame to phase out subsidies. They could reduce the burden on the
poor by targeting the public distribution and poverty alleviation
programmes. The Commission wants the Tenth Plan to aim for a 9
per cent rate of growth, by pulling up the northern States,
reversing the slowdown in the agriculture and manufacturing
sectors and enhancing the total investment ratio from 24 to 30
per cent of the GDP on an annual basis. To achieve such ambitious
targets, the PC has to be drastically restructured and revamped.
It has to be made proactive and relevant to the planning process.
Mr. Vajpayee hinted at `difficult steps' with far-reaching
changes in policies and systems perhaps after the knee operation.
Unless he is able to first convince his allies, the `Swadeshi'
lobby and the State Governments, it will be difficult to take
those crucial decisions in time to push up the growth trajectory
at least in the Tenth Plan.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : For a mystique of leadership Next : Pakistan's polity and its viability | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|