|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, November 14, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
BSES blames TEC for stalling Saphale project
MUMBAI, NOV. 13. The power utility BSES today accused Tata
Electric Companies (TEC) of opposing its proposed Rs. 1,500 crore
power project at Saphale in Palghar.
``Even now, when Mumbai is reeling under power shortage, I fail
to understand why TEC is opposed to Saphale,'' the BSES Chairman
and Managing Director, Mr. R. V. Shahi, told reporters here
today.
``We have never opposed TEC's move for capacity addition, then
why should they do so for us?'' Mr. Shahi asked.
He said, let there be capacity addition, neither us nor TEC have
to face any kind of hassles of power purchase agreement, escrow
accounts or any harassment from the State Government.
``Mumbai is a growing city, in fact we must go on adding capacity
to create a high cushion in the system,'' Mr. Shahi said adding,
``as a power sector professional, I can say, absence of creating
capacity addition is costing the metropolis.''
As per the Maharashtra Government's order, BSES' Saphale would be
set up in two phases, Mr. Shahi said adding it was awaiting
environmental and several other clearances from the State as well
as the Centre.
BSES has already signed a memorandum of understanding with Oil
and Natural Gas Corporation for sourcing some volume of gas from
the Mumbai High offshore region, he added.
Over the recent controversy of payment of Rs. 363 crore standby
charges by BSES to TEC, Mr. Shahi contended that there were no
separate charges to be paid but an integral part of the tariff
comprising energy charge, demand charge, demand charge for
standby supply, additional energy charge and fuel adjustment
charge.
Alleging that TEC was already charging BSES `more than required,'
Mr. Shahi said, the actual cost of power should not be more than
Rs. 2.50, while the Tatas were charging Rs. 3.70 from the
company.
He welcomed the State Government's decision to refer the matter
to the State Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) and said
BSES would honour the authority's judgment.
``A transparent investigation by MERC on how a stand-by charge
was an integral part of the tarrif will solve the matter,'' Mr.
Shahi added.
- PTI
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : HM to sell earthmoving division Next : Sensex down on selling pressure | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|