|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, November 25, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Next
China's pledge of restraint
CHINA'S STRATEGIC DECISION to desist from helping other countries
to develop ballistic missiles, which could be used to deliver
nuclear weapons, is a salutary pledge. If honoured, its
beneficial spinoff will have deep international implications. Not
surprisingly, Washington has warmly reciprocated this by viewing
Beijing's new diplomacy as a window of opportunity to advance the
U.S.' global agenda of non-proliferation. In a sense, Beijing has
now impliedly addressed New Delhi's assertive belief, too, that
China has been masterminding Pakistan's missile acquisition
programme over a long period. Speaking of ``transfers to
countries that are developing ballistic missiles'', China says
that it ``will exercise special scrutiny and caution''. The
stated Chinese aim is to ``prevent significant contributions'' to
unspecified countries. However, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea
are often suspected to be the recipients of China's missile-
related munificence. Overall, the punchline in China's statement
is that the new norms will apply even to those items not
specifically covered under Beijing's existing ban on exports.
Moreover, China will ``further improve and reinforce'' its
``export control system'' now defined by its own ``missile non-
proliferation policy''. The sweeping array of commitments
includes an unprecedented ban on the export of dual-use items
with military applications. This catalogue of do's and don'ts
deserves to be commended. Resonant is the Chinese theme of
restraint in eschewing overt and clandestine support for the
missile plans of any country. Yet it is certainly not easy to
devise a litmus test to assess Beijing's sustainable good faith.
India cannot therefore be faulted for being guarded or even
sceptical in its own evaluation of Beijing's latest manifesto of
abstinence from missile-proliferation. New Delhi's strong
suspicion about China's past transfers of missiles or parts
thereof to Pakistan has often been confirmed by Washington's
independent findings. The saga of Pakistan's perceived
acquisition of M-11 missiles or components thereof from China
sometime ago, besides perhaps the knowhow too, is still a
critical factor in India's long-term thinking on this subject.
New Delhi has already highlighted its China-related concerns to
Washington and the new entente with the United States would
probably provide a context within which strategic information,
including the China-Pakistan arms transfers, will be more easily
exchanged. Yet, more importantly, India must seek to preserve the
momentum of its strategic dialogue with China. A matter of some
positive ambience for India in this context is the American
decision to retain and enlarge its current sanctions on civilian
and military `entities' in Pakistan as also Iran that had in the
past received China's help for their missile programmes. Although
Iran is not akin to Pakistan in New Delhi's calculus, the obvious
message from the U.S. is that these two countries should clear
their stables in this sensitive sphere.
The U.S. tends to assume that its own diplomatic goading of China
has had a desirable impact. The timing of Beijing's announcement
within days of a U.S.-China summit on the sidelines of an Asia-
Pacific conference is not insignificant. Yet the question is
whether China is seeking a trade-off by promising to hold its
hand over international missile proliferation so that Washington
could review its plan for a theatre-missile defence system (TMD)
in the Asia-Pacific zone. China sees the TMD as a ploy to
encircle it strategically. Moreover, China has already hinted at
making common cause with Russia in opposing the U.S.' now-
deferred plans for a national missile defence system (NMD). As
seen by Beijing, the NMD may catapult the U.S. to a new military
apogee. So, Washington's considered offer of civilian space
collaboration with China, as a reward for its good intentions on
the missile front, is a move to try and keep Beijing within
bounds on its anti-NMD front.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Next : Invading young minds | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|