|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, November 29, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
Shourie attacks industry ambivalence on reforms
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, NOV. 28. The Disinvestment Minister, Mr. Arun Shourie,
today attacked the ``ambivalence'' of the industry towards
economic reforms even as he criticised the Congress for seeking
to erase its past policies. Domestic industrialists were volubly
in favour of deregulation, he noted, as long it was not their own
sectors. As for the Congress, he claimed that the party
president, Ms. Sonia Gandhi, was reading a whole new set of
speeches while the former Finance Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh,
was reticent about the new approach.
Mr. Shourie was responding to the plea by the Bajaj Auto chief,
Mr. Rahul Bajaj, for removing political hurdles in the way of
reforms at the valedictory session of the India Economic Summit.
A smiling Mr. Shourie told the audience of corporate captains,
``you are so resourceful and influential among the political and
bureaucratic class that you can bring opposition (to reforms) in
line''. The voices of opposition to reforms were guided by what
industry told them. Thus it was for the corporates to carry
forward the education of the politicians and civil society.
He even suggested that the industry support States ruled by
Congress governments in their drive towards privatisation of
public sector units. ``When you help them, every state's task is
precipitated,'' he said.
Referring to the Congress' economic policies, he felt that Dr.
Manmohan Singh should not be so reticent. The former Finance
Minister sat as a ``silent spectator'' in Parliament witnessing
things he would not have wanted to happen.
Elaborating on the industry's ambivalent approach, he cited the
example of the print media suddenly becoming nationalistic about
the opening up of the sector. Similarly, Indian companies sought
liberalisation to enter into joint ventures with multinationals
but sought government controls when the foreign firms sought to
buy out their shares.
He did not leave out the business press either and accused
journalists of building up temporary hype and the illusion of
great progress while writing about the stock markets and massive
market capitalisation of companies. When the Nasdaq fell, there
was a sudden loss of confidence in the country's IT sector, he
noted.
Urging the industry to stop ``heckling'' the Government, he said
it should carry out activities independently and in a cooperative
manner. Several Japanese companies had combined to carry out
research into super-conductivity, he said adding that Indian
corporates, instead of coming together, were ``often just picking
each other's pockets and using the government's scissors''.
Making a separate set of suggestions to foreign investors, he
referred to the rush to invest in China and warned ``the jury is
still out on that (country)''. Maintaining that he had made a
study of closed societies, he asked them to review their returns
on investments after a decade in China. Even so, he commended the
Chinese economic performance and felt India could learn many
lessons from that country.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Subrahmanyam committee report to be discussed next week Next : Chapel attacked in Surat | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|