|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, November 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Globalisation
Sir, - Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee's call for the benefits of
globalisation to filter down to the common people at the India
Economic Summit organised by the World Economic Forum is good in
intention at best, but going by the past experience and the
future course of reforms and initiatives, it will only lead to a
greater divide between the ``haves'' and ``havenots''.
We do not seem to have learnt from the experience of the last
decade that reforms and globalisation have not improved the lot
of poor and marginalised people. Has their quality of life
improved? The answer is a resounding ``No''. It is visible for
all to see, both in the urban and the rural areas.
Employment, water supply, sanitation, public health and primary
education are lagging behind. At the same Forum, our Finance
Minister, Mr. Yeshwant Sinha, said that the palpable effect of
growth has to be in terms of providing basic minimum needs such
as schools, medical services and clean drinking water. Is there a
specific strategy for this? They are merely paying lip service.
It will remain mere rhetoric so long as the dichotomy between
intentions and action at the ground level continues as it is. I
say ``good intentions'' because there is difference between
``good intentions'' and the right initiatives at the ground
level.
Successive governments have shown that they have not delivered.
They cannot deliver and the only salvation is empowerment of
women and the rural and urban masses. First, we have to remove
the impediments in the way of empowerment - less government, not
more government.
We should revisit our approach to globalisation and reforms, and
on our terms, keeping in mind India's requirements and interest.
Do we have the guts to do it? That the growth of IT will help
solve our problems is a myth.
Top-down development is necessary but is not the panacea.
Grassroots, bottom-up development, for our country with a
majority of the population who are either poor or do not have a
sustainable income, is more relevant.
``Despite unprecedented increase in overall opulence, the
contemporary world denies elementary freedom to vast numbers -
perhaps even the majority - of people,'' says Dr. Amartya Sen.
When will we wake up?
M. V. Murugappan,
Chennai
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Food, peace & development Next : Forces not for flailing | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|