|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, November 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
Threat perception over imports from China
Apprehensions abound in Indian industry over the consequences of
Chinese products entering the country. Ranmath Subbu takes a look
at the evolving scenario.
INDIAN INDUSTRY claims that low cost products from China are
finding their way into the homes of Indian consumers and hurting
Indian producers, but what is not known is how widespread this
phenomenon is. The groups which are most vocal and most affected
are the small and medium scale units.
Allegations of dumping are being made in an environment where
consumer goods are subject to quantitative restrictions (QRs) and
tariff levels remain high. With remaining QRs likely to be phased
out in the next few months, if tariff levels are not raised
significantly significantly large scale could dent the Indian
small scale manufacturers further. The complaints are
specifically about cheaper Chinese imports that are coming in the
form of tyres, bicycles, dry cell batteries, fibres, ferro
alloys, edible oils, chemicals and consumer electronics and
components.
There has been allegedly a quantum jump in such imports since
April 2000. According to a Federation of Indian Chambers of
Commerce & Industry (FICCI) study, imports have since jumped more
than three-fold for some items like batteries. In the case of
items such as shoes or electronic components also, the increase
has also been significant.
Initial reaction from the Indian industry has tended to be one of
excessive caution. The position on tyres and plastics are cases
in point. The FICCI study states that ``on rough and ready
estimates'' Chinese tyres ``already'' a one per cent market
share. ``On the face of it, this is not large,'' the report says,
but adds that a delegation from Indian tyre-makers to China felt
that ``China could pose a big threat to the Indian tyre
industry'' in view of price advantages.
It is not surprising that China chose the Indian market as an
export destination as the size and proximity to China are two
attractive propositions.
The Chinese economy has several inherent advantages over many
other countries: exports are growing rapidly - the annual growth
of exports increased from 11.5 per cent in the 1980s to 14.5 per
cent in the 1990s. Amazingly, China's trade surplus with the U.S.
is comparable to India's total export turnover.
At a recent meeting of the `Track China' cell of the
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), Mr. Ravi Sinha, CEO, SRF
Ltd., and chairman of the cell, said China can be seen from three
perspectives: as a role model, as a potential competitor and as a
partner for India.
China is undertaking its third generation reforms but it suffers
from severe regional disparities. Unlike India, however, China
has seen the World Trade Organisation (WTO) as a catalyst for
restructuring its industry and has undertaken amalgamations and
placed a renewed focus on productivity.
A 1997 World Bank study, `China 2020' shows that China will
become the world's second largest exporter by 2020 after the U.S.
Currently 40 per cent of Chinese exports are in electronics.
Further, China's success can be attributed to having an export
culture in each and every sphere.
There is no doubt that cheaper imports from China have had an
impact on the smaller scale manufacturers here. Recognising this,
the government has initiated steps towards correcting the
situation and the Customs Preventive Department has conducted
raids on several importers of Chinese goods and seized items
worth several lakhs of rupees. There is a blueprint to rescue the
domestic industry from the spectre of cheap imports.
Indian initiatives
First, the government has increased the basic duty on imports of
edible oils. The duty on refined palm oil and RBD palmolein has
been increased from 35 per cent to 65 per cent. According to the
Soyabean Processors Association of India (SOPA), ``The 10 per
cent hike in crude and refined oils other than palm oil and RBD
palmolein would put a stop to the unbridled import of cheaper
edible oil into the country and regulate the imports to the gap
between the demand and supply. This would also enable the
domestic edible oil industry to get a remunerative price for
their produce.''
Second, the government has ordered anti-dumping investigation
into select Chinese imports and is laying down the standards for
imported goods. This is the first time that the anti-dumping
mechanism has been activated against consumer goods.
Third, the introduction of compulsory licensing for imports. This
is permitted under WTO norms and while the government would not
deny a licence, it would require information and prior notice. It
is making licensing compulsory for all imports. The special
import licence idea is based on the Singapore model where all
imports are subject to compulsory licensing. This mandatory
licensing would help in collection of detailed data on all
imports and would allow easier interpretation of import trends.
Lastly, the government has imposed BIS (Bureau of Indian
Standards) norms on the import of 131 goods. This regulation for
making imports adhere to BIS standards and compulsory printing of
retail price was cleared by a high-powered committee constituted
by the Prime Minister to monitor imports. While the printing of
retail price would help check under-invoicing, the adherence to
BIS standards would prevent inflow of sub-standard goods.
According to the order, which came into effect last week, an
exporter has to register himself with the BIS. The products
imported would have to comply with all conditions listed in the
Standards of Weights and Measures (Packed Commodity) Order of
1977 which is currently applicable on items produced within the
country. Products failing to comply with the order would be held
up by the Customs. Also, it is now compulsory for all imported
goods to carry the name and address of the importer. A
notification to this effect was issued by the Directorate General
of Foreign Trade (DGFT) last week.
Also, the printing of maximum retail price would help as it
should include all taxes, freight, transport charges, commission,
advertising cost, delivery, packaging and forwarding expenses.
But there are critics of the steps initiated by the Government.
According to Mr. Venugopal Dhoot, managing director, Videocon
International, a leading player in consumer goods and
electronics, ``The government's reaction is wrong in this matter.
It is not possible to over-value Chinese goods coming in. As a
signatory of the WTO India should not impose such restrictions.
We will have to take the competition head-on. Indian labour is
the cheapest in the world and we have to show by performance that
we can compete with any product coming from anywhere.''
A segment that has taken a hit has been the domestic electronic
component industry. According to Mr. B. S. Sethia, Honorary
Secretary, Electronic Component Industries Association (ELCINA)
and director, Elin Electronics, ``The situation has been grim
because more than 50 per cent of electronic accessories and
equipment come from the unorganised sector. Products from China
are either grossly under-invoiced or smuggled and they are priced
10-15 per cent lower than in the domestic market.''
Earlier, the duty on finished components was at a maximum of 45
per cent and that on raw material was between 5 and 25 per cent.
But in the last two years, the duty on raw material increased to
35 per cent and that on finished components came down to 15 per
cent.
The total requirement of components is around Rs. 10,000 crores,
while local production of components is Rs. 5,500 crores. There
have been no fresh investments in the electronics component
industry except in colour TV specific components which are not
affected by the grey market as CTVs are mainly manufactured by
the organised sector which pays excise duty and avail CENVAT.
However, according to Mr. Sethia, most other equipment such as
audios, B&W TVs, electronic accessories and small gadgets are
manufactured by the unorganised sector which does not fall in the
excise paying bracket and hence do not avail of CENVAT. ``This
has encouraged the grey market as domestic makers cannot compete
with it after paying high excise duty and other taxes. This has
resulted in closure of around 100 units in the last decade after
initiation of liberalisation process since 1991,'' said Mr.
Sethia.
According to Mr. Sethia, the industry exports about Rs. 1,200
crores worth of goods and the demand that is met through imports
is Rs 5,700 crores with official imports of Rs 3000 crores and
the unofficial (grey) market of Rs 2,700 crores. Of the total
industry, ``Rs 2,500 crores constitutes the market for colour
television components where there is no grey market.'' said Mr.
Sethia, adding, ``A Rs 1,800 crores component manufacturing
industry is facing a grey market of Rs 2,700 crores.''
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : Monitor Next : Dominance in plastics market | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|