|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, November 30, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
The path ahead
One can see that in terms of rate of growth, we have done better
in the latter half of the 20th century than during the first
half, and far better in the final two decades. Over the period,
fluctuations in growth of output have been reduced. The
resilience to withstand shocks has progressively increased.
External sector has become comfortable in the sense that there is
no foreign currency constraint on growth now. Yet, we have
pervading poverty, high illiteracy and poor condition of health
and sanitation.
There are islands of excellence like information technology
experts amidst a sea of deprivation and misery. Clearly, economic
policy, especially of the 1990s has removed several constraints
on economic growth, which is in itself an achievement and a
necessary condition for the rest of the goals of a civil society.
But, there are lurking doubts on whether we are systematically
building a system that would ensure continued high level of
growth and, achievement of minimum social objectives associated
with such growth.
Economic indicators show that we are one of the fastest growing
economies now, with high savings and investment ratios coupled
with a respectable level of productivity as evidenced by capital
output ratios. External sector is comfortable, though with
relatively low level of capital inflows, a reflection as much of
lack of interest of overseas investors as of ambivalent attitude
domestically. Our position in Current Competitiveness Index shows
confidence in our growth performance in the short run. However,
our position in Growth Competitiveness Index indicates a less
optimistic picture in the future growth of per capita income. The
position in regard to other related indicators also gives rise to
a feeling that factors contributing to current growth are
relatively stronger than those contributing to future growth,
unless strong policy actions are initiated soon. At the same
time, there is impressive confidence that our economy will not go
into a slump - ours is a very stable economy.
Institutional indicators may provide some answer to this
difference in perception between immediate and medium term to
long-term prospects. The evidence is subjective and hence not
very reliable, but the high rank in corruption is of concern.
More disturbing is the perception that effectiveness of
government is low. As regards the role of law and business
environment, the picture is satisfactory but does not, as per
current indications, appear to assure an environment for a high
growth path. The government, law, and business environment are
only means to an end, the end being socio-economic well-being of
the people. The critical part is in the outcomes as reflected in
socio-economic indicators where India appears to be lagging.
Yet another significant set of indicators relevant for medium
term prospects relate to infrastructure. India seems to score
rather poorly in regard to energy, say in terms of power-
consumption or wastage of power. In spite of recent improvements,
India is lagging in telecommunications, and is virtually the last
in penetration of personal computers. Here is an example of
islands of excellence in information technology, but the domestic
penetration of information technology is very low. While
assessing the future, we should note that, though we have a large
pool of scientific personnel and engineers, in terms of their
deployment in research and development, we are almost at the
bottom.
Finally, the end product of all economic policy is social well
being, and admittedly the long term prospects for economic growth
also depend crucially on the social well being. The social
indicators in regard to our country do not give us too much of
comfort.
Overall, we rank rather low in human development and high in
human deprivation. In spite of this, one notices relatively low
levels of public expenditures in health, and in primary education
though mere expenditures may not reflect actual delivery of
services. The policymakers and more importantly opinion makers
including academics perhaps need to consider issue of the mending
of mindset in favour of the poor.
(Concluded)
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : India in the global context Next : On diesel consumption | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|