Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Friday, December 01, 2000

Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Entertainment | Miscellaneous | Features | Classifieds | Employment | Index | Home

Business | Previous

Clarification

Ms. Arati Mukerji, PR Manager-India, Lucent Technologies, New Delhi, writes:

With reference to the report ``ITI aggrieved over fate of Rs. 400 crore tender for hi-tech exchanges'' that appeared in these columns on November 27, I would like to inform you that the information given is incorrect.

We wish to inform you that the V5.2 interface is always purchased on the basis of multiples of E1 only and cannot be technically sub-divided below E1, as stated in the report.

Even in the previous tenders of DoT, the description of ``per channel of PCM'' is exactly the same as in the current tender. I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate that Lucent Technologies, with its international quality products, has quoted the lowest price in this DoT tender and looks forward to getting a substantial portion of the order.

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail


Section  : Business
Previous : Monitor

Front Page | National | Southern States | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Entertainment | Miscellaneous | Features | Classifieds | Employment | Index | Home

Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu

Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu