|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Saturday, December 02, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Other States
| Previous
| Next
Rape of minor girl, SC raps Delhi HC
By Our Legal Correspondent
NEW DELHI, DEC.1. The Supreme Court has rapped the Delhi High
Court for acquitting two "sex maniacs" who "libidinously ravaged
a tiny female tot (four years old) like wild beasts and finished
her off".
Setting aside the High Court judgment, a Bench comprising Mr.
Justice K.T. Thomas and Mr. Justice R.P. Sethi found the two
accused guilty of the rape charge and awarded life imprisonment
to them.
The Bench was of the view that the trial court had come to the
correct conclusion that the two respondents were the rapists and
awarded death penalty to one of them and sentenced the other to
life imprisonment.
"The High Court has grossly erred in interfering with such a
correct conclusion made by the trial court as the reasons adopted
by the High court for such interference are very tenuous", the
Bench said.
The Bench restored the trial court's conviction to the extent of
awarding the maximum punishment of life imprisonment to both the
respondents for offences under Sections 376 and 377 read with
Sec. 34 of IPC.
Referring to the findings of the High court that the version of
the police could not be true, the Bench observed "we feel that it
is an archaic notion that actions of the police officer should be
approached with initial distrust. We are aware that such a notion
was lavishly entertained during the British period and policemen
also knew about it. Its hang over persisted during post-
Independent years but it is time now to start placing at least
initial trust on the actions and the documents made by the
police".
The Bench was of the view that "it is not legally approvable
procedure to presume the police action as unreliable to start
with, nor to jettison such action merely for the reason that
police did not collect signatures of independent persons in the
documents made contemporaneous with such actions".
The case of the prosecution was that on September 5, 1992, the
two accused took away the child from the mother and after raping
the girl, killed her. While the trial court awarded death
sentence to one and life imprisonment to the other, on appeal,
the High Court acquitted both of them. Against this the National
Capital Territory of Delhi government preferred the present
appeals to the Apex Court.
Disposing of the appeal, the Bench said from the woeful and
eerie features described by the doctor, no court could possibly
escape from the conclusion that the little child was violently
molested, ravished, raped and sodomised. Though the sessions
court had acted on the medical report as reliable, it was
unfortunate that the High court expressed misgivings about it,
the Bench said and set aside the High Court's order.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Other States Previous : Wings clipped, the don still a terror Next : No caning of schoolchildren | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|