|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, December 04, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
Infiltration the issue: Advani
Our Special Correspondent
AJMER, DEC. 3. The Union Home Minister, Mr. L.K. Advani, today
said the country could open a dialogue with Pakistan only if it
discontinued its support to militants from across the border.
``The crucial thing is infiltration,'' he said. The External
Affairs Ministry would formally react to Pakistan's suggestion
for a dialogue, he said. He could not commit more as Parliament
was in session.
UNI reports:
``The Union Government is trying to know the truth behind
yesterday's announcement of maximum restraint by Pakistan,'' Mr.
Advani said. He declined comment on the demand for talks with the
All-Party Hurriyat Conference. On the shootout incident at the
residence of the Navy Chief, Admiral Sushil Kumar, in Delhi a few
days ago, Mr. Advani said the probe was on.
`It is high time they did it'
By Our Special Correspondent
BANGALORE, DEC. 3. The Defence Minister, Mr. George Fernandes,
today reacted to Pakistan's announcement of ``maximum restraint''
along the Line of Control in response to the Centre's Ramzan
ceasefire in Jammu and Kashmir, saying, ``It is high time they
did it.'' He said the resumption of dialogue depended on Pakistan
stopping the despatch of terrorists into the country and
genuinely ceasing fire from across the border.
The Defence Minister was speaking to presspersons after visiting
the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, the Electronic and the Radar
Development Establishment and the Gas Turbine Research
Establishment.
Asked specifically about Pakistan's ordering its troops to
observe ``maximum restraint'' along the LoC and its willingness
to enter into a meaningful dialogue on the Kashmir issue, Mr.
Fernandes snapped: ``Who will not welcome a move of that
nature?... (but) what exactly do they mean when they say
restraint?''
He noted that Pakistan, by default, had admitted it had been
firing from across the border. As India had always only returned
the fire, it had to be a one-sided ``restraint''.
He declined to react to a question on extending the unilateral
ceasefire ordered by the Prime Minister, Mr. A.B.Vajpayee, beyond
the month of Ramzan. It depended on the course of events and no
positive statement could be made at this juncture. But India
certainly wanted the ceasefire to be an all-time affair. ``Who
will not like an all-time ceasefire?''
He also said negotiations were not related to stoppage of firing
from across the border. Besides, Pakistan should also close down
the training camps for terrorists in Occupied Kashmir. There
should be ``normalisation'' before India entered into talks with
Pakistan.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : BJP cautious, Cong. sees hope | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|